Helvetic Confessions: Difference between revisions
TurnipWatch (talk | contribs) →History: adding citation |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (32 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|16th century Swiss reformed confessions of faith}} |
|||
{{Calvinism}} |
|||
{{Distinguish|Helvetic Consensus}} |
|||
The '''Helvetic Confessions''' are two documents expressing the common belief of the [[Calvinist]] churches of [[Switzerland]]. |
|||
[[File:Confessio Helvetica prior manuscript.jpg|thumb|Latin & German [[manuscript]], ''Confessio Helvetica Prior'']]{{Sister project|project=wikisource|text=[[Wikisource]] has an [[Wikisource:The Creeds of Christendom: with a History and Critical Notes/Volume III/Appendix: The Second Helvetic Confession|English translation of the Second Helvetic Confession]]}} |
|||
The '''Helvetic Confessions''' are two documents expressing the common belief of [[Reformed Christianity|Reformed]] churches, especially in [[Switzerland]], whose primary author was the [[Swiss Reformed]] [[theologian]] [[Heinrich Bullinger]]. The First Helvetic Confession (1536) contributed to the confessional unity of the [[Protestantism|Protestant]] [[cantons of Switzerland]] against the Roman Catholic cantons, whereas the Second Helvetic Confession (1566) contributed to the confessional unity of Reformed churches across [[Europe]], particularly due to the patronage it received from [[Frederick III, Elector Palatine]], who had it translated into German.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Buzogány |first=Dezső |title=Die Zürcher Reformation in Europa |publisher=Theologischer Verlag Zürich |year=2021 |isbn=9783290183042 |editor-last=Albisser |editor-first=Ariane |language=de |trans-title=The Zurich Reformation in Europe |chapter=The Influence of the Second Helvetic Confession on the Hungarian Reformed Church Life in Transylvania |editor-last2=Opitz |editor-first2=Peter}}</ref>{{Rp|page=635}}<ref name="EB1911" /> |
|||
==First Helvetic Confession== |
|||
==History== |
|||
The '''First Helvetic Confession''' ({{lang-la|Confessio Helvetica prior}}), known also as the '''Second Confession of Basel''', was drawn up in [[Basel]] in 1536 by [[Heinrich Bullinger]] and [[Leo Jud]] of |
The '''First Helvetic Confession''' ({{lang-la|Confessio Helvetica prior}}), known also as the '''Second Confession of Basel''', was drawn up in [[Basel]] in 1536 by [[Heinrich Bullinger]] and [[Leo Jud]] of Zurich, [[Kaspar Megander]] of [[Bern]], [[Oswald Myconius]] and [[Simon Grynaeus]] of Basel, [[Martin Bucer]] and [[Wolfgang Capito]] of [[Strasbourg]], with other representatives from [[Schaffhausen]], [[St. Gallen|St Gall]], [[Mühlhausen]] and [[Biel]]. Bucer and Capito in particular aimed to reconcile Reformed and Lutheran doctrine through the Confession.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last=Curtis |first=William A. |title=A History of Creeds and Confessions of Faith in Christendom and Beyond |publisher=T. & T. Clark |year=1911 |location=Edinburgh}}</ref>{{Rp|page=203}} The first draft was written in [[Latin]] and the Zurich delegates objected to its [[Lutheranism|Lutheran]] phraseology. However, Leo Jud's [[German language|German]] translation was accepted by all, and after Myconius and Grynaeus had modified the Latin form, both versions were agreed to and adopted on February 26, 1536.<ref name="EB1911">{{EB1911 |wstitle=Helvetic Confessions |volume=13 |page=253 |inline=1}}</ref> Bucer and Capito brought the Confession to [[Martin Luther]] as a symbol of Reformed-Lutheran unity, but he ultimately rejected it.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Wedgeworth |first=Steven |date=2022-07-28 |title=Adiaphora in The First Helvetic Confession |url=https://adfontesjournal.com/steven-wedgeworth/adiaphora-in-the-first-helvetic-confession/ |access-date=2024-03-25 |website=Ad Fontes |language=en-US}}</ref> |
||
The first five articles affirm the Protestant doctrine of [[Sola scriptura|''sola scriptura'']], viewing Holy Scripture as its own interpreter, containing all that is necessary to know for salvation (sufficiency) and supremely authoritative over all other human writings. Article VI treats of the Trinity of persons in one divine essence. Articles VII-X discuss God's creation of man in his image; the most noble of creatures, which fell into sin by the [[original sin]] of Adam, and God's eternal plan of salvation for fallen man. <ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=203}} Articles XI-XIV teach that we are saved by God's grace through Christ through [[faith alone]]. Articles XV-XX treat of the Church, its authority and the office of the ministry. Articles XXI-XXIII are distinctly Reformed in [[Sacrament|sacramentology]], regarding [[baptism]] and the [[Eucharist|Lord's supper]] as 'holy symbols of high mysteries, not mere or empty signs, but significant signs accompanying spiritual realities; in Baptism, water is the sign, regeneration and adoption the reality; in the Supper the bread and wine are signs, communion of the body and blood of the Lord is the spiritual reality'.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=204}} Finally, Articles XXIV-XXVIII treat of public worship, ceremonies, [[Christian marriage|marriage]] and schism. |
|||
| ⚫ | The '''Second Helvetic Confession''' (Latin: ''Confessio Helvetica posterior'') was written by Bullinger in 1562 and revised in 1564 as a private exercise. It came to the notice of [[Elector Palatine]] [[Frederick III, Elector Palatine|Frederick III]], who had it translated into German and published.<ref name=EB1911/> |
||
[[File:Confessio_Helvetica_Posterior_title_page.jpg|left|thumb|''Confessio Helvetica posterior'']] |
|||
== Second Helvetic Confession == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | The '''Second Helvetic Confession''' (Latin: ''Confessio Helvetica posterior'') was written by Bullinger in 1562 and revised in 1564 as a private exercise. It came to the notice of [[Elector Palatine]] [[Frederick III, Elector Palatine|Frederick III]], who had it translated into German and published.<ref name="EB1911" /> The Confession was attractive to some Reformed leaders as a corrective to what they saw as the overly Lutheran statements of the [[Strasbourg Consensus]]. An attempt was made in early 1566 to have all the churches of Switzerland sign the Second Helvetic Confession as a common statement of faith.<ref name="digitalcommons.unl.edu">[http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=historyfacpub Burnett, Amy Nelson. 1992. "Simon Sulzer and the Consequences of the 1563 Strasbourg Consensus in Switzerland" in ''Archive for Reformation History'' 83: 154–179, p. 178]</ref> It gained a favorable hold on the Swiss churches, who had found the First Confession too short and too Lutheran.<ref name="EB1911" /> However, 'the Basel clergy refused to sign the confession, stating that although they found no fault with it, they preferred to stand by their own [[Confession of Basel|Basel Confession]] of 1534.'<ref name="digitalcommons.unl.edu" /> Due to this near-universal approval in Reformed Switzerland, Frederick presented it to the [[Diet of Augsburg]] of 1566 as an authoritative document representing the international Reformed faith.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=208}} According to W. A. Curtis, 'In theological ability and in doctrinal interest few Confessions can bear comparison with it [...] it would be difficult to conceive of a theological manifesto, or compendium of doctrine, more attractive in form and matter, more lucid, effective, and shrewd, more loyal to Scripture, or more instinct with common sense.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=208}} |
||
=== |
=== Contents === |
||
| ⚫ | Mary is mentioned several times in the Second Helvetic Confession, which expounds Bullinger's mariology. |
||
For this reason we believe that the Virgin Mary, Begetter of God, the most pure bed and temple of the Holy Spirit, that is, her most holy body, was carried to heaven by angels.<ref>''The Thousand Faces of the Virgin Mary'' (1996), George H. Tavard, Liturgical Press {{ISBN|0-8146-5914-4}} {{ISBN|9780814659144}}, p. 109. [https://books.google.com/books?id=Y3gtHzATNB4C&dq=%22sancti+templum%2C+hoc+est%22&pg=PA109]</ref></blockquote>The French Confession de Foy, the Scottish Confessio Fidei, the Belgian Ecclasiarum Belgicarum Confessio and the Heidelberg Catechism, all include references to the [[Virgin birth of Jesus|Virgin Birth]], mentioning specifically, that ''Jesus was born without the participation of a man''.<ref name="Chavannes 426" /> Invocations to Mary were not tolerated, however, in light of Calvin’s position that any prayer to saints in front of an altar is prohibited.{{citation needed|date=October 2012}} |
|||
Chapters 1 and 2 treat of the doctrine of Scripture as the sole infallible authority (''sola scriptura''), regarding it as its own interpreter, and subjecting all other human writings (traditional or Patristic) to the standard of the Bible.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=209}} Chapter 3 confesses the Trinity of persons in the one divine essence and accepts the [[Apostles' Creed]], condemning 'Jews and Mohammedans and all who blaspheme this holy and adorable Trinity,' and 'all heretics who deny the deity of Christ and the Holy Ghost.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=210}} Chapter 4 expresses [[iconoclasm]] and condemns images of God or Christ. Chapter 5 rejects the [[Intercession of saints|invocation of saints]], 'nevertheless we neither despise nor undervalue the saints, but honour them as the members of Christ and the friends of God who have gloriously overcome the flesh and the world; we love them as brethren and hold them up as examples of faith and virtue, desiring to dwell with them eternally in heaven and to rejoice with them in Christ.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=210}} Chapter 6 establishes the characteristically Reformed doctrine of [[divine providence]], while allowing for [[Secondary causation|secondary causes]] operating within God's sovereignty; 'we disapprove of the rash words of those who say that our efforts and endeavours are vain.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=210}} Chapters 7-9 teach that man consists of two substances: body and soul ([[Bipartite (theology)|bipartite view]]); the latter of which is said to be immortal, 'We condemn those who deny immortality, or affirm the sleep of the soul, or teach that it is a part of God.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=210}} The creation of man by God as upright is detailed, along with the original sin and the [[total depravity]] for all of humanity which it entails. Only those who are regenerate are considered free from, 'being moved by the Spirit of God to do of themselves what they do',<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=210}} although the unregenerate remain wilful slaves to unrighteousness. Chapter 10 on [[predestination]] has been interpreted as 'moderate Calvinism' or Augustinianism, and emphasises Christians' assurance of predestination through communion with Christ, 'We shall have a sufficient testimony of being written in the book of life if we live in communion with Christ, and if in true faith He is ours and we are His.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=|pages=210-211}} The chapter references {{Bibleref|Philippians|2:13|KJV}}, ''For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.'' Chapter 11, besides confessing the [[hypostatic union]] of Christ's human and divine nature, accepts 'believingly and reverently the ''[[Communicatio idiomatum|communication of properties]]'', which is deduced from Scripture and employed by the universal ancient Church in explaining and reconciling passages apparently in contradiction.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=211}} Chapter 14 describes the Protestant doctrine of [[penitence]].<blockquote>It is sufficient to confess our sins to God in private and in the public service; it is not necessary to confess to a priest, for this is nowhere commanded in the Scriptures; although we may seek counsel and comfort from a minister of the gospel in times of distress and trial (cf. Jas. v. 16). The keys of the kingdom of heaven, out of which the Papists forge swords, sceptres, and crowns, are given to all legitimate ministers of the Church in the preaching of the Gospel and the maintenance of discipline (Matt. xvi. 19; John xx. 23; Mark xvi. 15; 2 Cor. v. 18, 19). We condemn the lucrative Popish doctrines of penance and indulgences, and apply to them Peter's word to Simon Magus, ''Thy money perish with thee''.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=211}}</blockquote>[[File:Portret van Zwitserse theoloog en kerkhervormer Johann Heinrich Bullinger Henricus Bullingerus Reformator Tigurinus (titel op object), RP-P-1908-3814.jpg|thumb|Heinrich Bullinger, the primary author of the Helvetic Confessions.]]Chapter 16 describes the nature of faith as no mere opinion or persuasion, but rather a free gift of God and the source of good works. Chapter 17 explicitly espouses the doctrine of the [[Church invisible]], 'The Church may be called ''invisible'', not that the men composing it are invisible, but because they are known only to God, while we are often mistaken in our judgment: those who separate from that true Church cannot live before God. [...] As there was no salvation out of the ark of Noah, so there is no certain salvation out of Christ, who exhibits Himself to the elect in the Church for their nourishment.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=211}} Chapter 18 espouses [[presbyterian polity]] in claiming that the offices of [[presbyter]] and [[bishop]] were one in the Apostolic Church. Ministers are expected to be learned although 'innocent simplicity may be more useful than haughty learning.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=212}} Chapter 19 defines the two sacraments as 'sacred rites instituted by God as signs and seals of His promises [cf. {{Bibleref|Romans|4:11|KJV}}] for the strengthening of our faith, and as pledges on our part of our consecration to Him.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=212}} |
|||
Of the five 'Popish' innovations, [[confirmation]] and [[extreme unction]] are dismissed while repentance, [[ordination]] and marriage are said to be divine institutions rather than sacraments. The chapter makes a difference between the ''sign'' and ''thing signified'' of the sacraments, and thus the dependance of the efficacy of the sacraments upon God's faithfulness rather than the minister's ([[Ex opere operato|''ex opere operato'']]). Chapter 21 states that the body of Christ is in heaven, and therefore our worship must be directed towards heaven, although Christ is spiritually present in us, and thus condemns the [[Eucharistic adoration]] of the [[Roman Catholic Mass|Roman Catholic mass]], 'The Mass—whatever it may have been in ancient times—has been turned from a salutary institution into a vain show and surrounded with various abuses which justify its abolition.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=212}} Chapter 24 states that the [[Sabbath in Christianity|Sabbath]] is 'observed in Christian freedom, not with Jewish superstition.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=212}} [[Liturgical feast|Liturgical feasts]] in honour of saints are rejected. [[Fasting]] and [[self-denial]] are encouraged and seen as spiritually profitable so long as they are prompted by humility and not by the desire for merit. Chapter 27, in alignment with the [[regulative principle of worship]], states that 'the more of human rites are accumulated in the Church, the more it is drawn away from Christian liberty and from Christ Himself, while the ignorant seek in ceremonies what they should seek in Christ through faith.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=213}} Chapter 30 confesses the legitimacy of the [[Political authority|civil magistrate]] as God's appointed servant, 'to preserve peace and public order, to promote and protect religion and good morals [...] to punish offenders against society, such as thieves, murderers, oppressors, blasphemers, and incorrigible heretics (if they are really heretics). [...] We condemn the [[Anabaptism|Anabaptists]] who maintain that a Christian should not hold a civil office, that the magistrate has no right to [[Capital punishment|punish any one by death]], or to make war or to demand an oath.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=213}} The chapter further states that '[[War|Wars]] are only justifiable in [[Self-defense|self-defence]] and after all efforts at peace have been exhausted.'<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=213}} |
|||
=== Reception === |
|||
| ⚫ | The Second Helvetic Confession was adopted by the Reformed Church not only throughout Switzerland but in [[Scotland]] (1566), [[Hungary]] (1567), [[France]] (1571), and [[Poland]] (1578).<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=208}} Along with the [[Thirty-nine Articles]], the [[Westminster Confession of Faith]], the [[Scots Confession]] and the [[Heidelberg Catechism]] is one the most generally recognized confessions of the [[Reformed Church]].<ref name="EB1911" /> According to Dezső Buzogány, 'the Confession had a vital part in [<nowiki/>[[Hungarian Reformed]]] church life in the 17th and 18th centuries. While the Heidelberg Catechism played a major role in educating the congregation and the children in matters of faith, the Second Helvetic Confession was significant in the formation and instruction of future clergymen.'<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|page=640|pages=}} The Hungarian Reformed Synod of [[Buda]] of 1791 formally rejected the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] and the [[Counter-Reformation]], as well as the teachings of [[Christian Wolff (philosopher)|Christian Wolff]], ordering schools to teach the Helvetic Confession as part of the official curriculum.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|page=|pages=639-640}} The Second Helvetic Confession was also included in the [[United Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A.]]'s ''Book of Confessions, ''in 1967, and remains in the ''[[Book of Confessions]]'' adopted by the [[Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)]].<ref name="BoCStudyEd">{{cite book |title=Book of Confessions Study Edition |date=1999 |publisher=Geneva Press |location=Louisville, Kentucky |isbn=978-0-664-50012-2}}</ref> |
||
=== Mariology === |
|||
| ⚫ | Mary is mentioned several times in the Second Helvetic Confession, which expounds Bullinger's [[mariology]]. Chapter 3 quotes the angel's message to the Virgin Mary, ''The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee'' ({{Bibleref|Luke|1:35|KJV}}), as an indication of the existence of the [[Holy Spirit]] and the [[Trinity]]. The Latin text described Mary as ''diva'', indicating her rank as a person, who dedicated herself to God. In Chapter 9, the Jesus Christ is said to be [[Virgin birth of Jesus|conceived by the Holy Spirit]] and born without the participation of any man. The Second Helvetic Confession accepted the 'Ever Virgin' notion from [[John Calvin]], which spread throughout much of Europe with the approbation of this document in the above-mentioned countries.<ref name="Chavannes 426">Chavannes 426</ref> Bullinger's 1539 polemical treatise against idolatry<ref>''De origine erroris libri duo'' (On the Origin of Error, Two Books) [https://books.google.com/books?id=EXLscQAACAAJ&q=%22De+origine+erroris+libri+duo%22]. "In the ''De origine erroris in divorum ac simulachrorum cultu'' he opposed the worship of the saints and iconolatry; in the ''De origine erroris in negocio Eucharistiae ac Missae'' he strove to show that the Catholic conceptions of the Eucharist and of celebrating the Mass were wrong. Bullinger published a combined edition of these works in [[Octavo|4 °]] (Zürich 1539), which was divided into two books, according to themes of the original work." ''The Library of the Finnish nobleman, royal secretary and trustee Henrik Matsson (''ca.'' 1540–1617)'', Terhi Kiiskinen Helsinki: Academia Scientarium Fennica (Finnish Academy of Science), 2003, {{ISBN|951-41-0944-9}} {{ISBN|9789514109447}}, p. 175 [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22he+opposed+the+worship+of+the+saints+and+iconolatry%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=WVr&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&num=10&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&tbs=#q=%22he+opposed+the+worship+of+the+saints+and+iconolatry%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=WVr&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&num=10&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=,bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp&fp=e0e76270dccd6427]</ref> expressed his belief that Mary's 'sacrosanctum corpus' ('sacrosanct body') had been [[Assumption of Mary|assumed]] into heaven by angels:<blockquote>For this reason we believe that the Virgin Mary, Begetter of God, the most pure bed and temple of the Holy Spirit, that is, her most holy body, was carried to heaven by angels.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011-08-11 |title=146 [146] – Caput XVI. – Seitenansicht – Astronomie-rara |url=http://astronomie-rara.ethbib.ethz.ch/zuz/content/pageview/937157 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110811231411/http://astronomie-rara.ethbib.ethz.ch/zuz/content/pageview/937157 |archive-date=2011-08-11 |access-date=2023-04-26 |at=page 70 (thumbnail 146)}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Tavard |first=George Henry |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y3gtHzATNB4C&dq=%22sancti+templum,+hoc+est%22&pg=PA109 |title=The Thousand Faces of the Virgin Mary |date=1996 |publisher=Liturgical Press |isbn=978-0-8146-5914-4 |pages=109 |language=en}}</ref></blockquote> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
{{Portal|Reformed Christianity}} |
|||
*[[Reformation in Switzerland]] |
*[[Reformation in Switzerland]] |
||
*[[Helvetic Consensus]] |
*[[Helvetic Consensus]] |
||
| Line 22: | Line 35: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
==Literature== |
|||
*Louis Thomas, ''La Confession helvétique'' (Geneva, 1853); |
|||
*[[Philip Schaff]], ''Creeds of Christendom'', i. 390-420, iii. 234-306; |
|||
*[[Julius Müller (theologian)|Julius Müller]], ''Die Bekenntnisschriften der reformierten Kirche'' (Leipzig, 1903). |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
| Line 39: | Line 47: | ||
{{reformed confessions}} |
{{reformed confessions}} |
||
{{Authority control}} |
{{Authority control}} |
||
[[Category:1536 works]] |
[[Category:1536 works]] |
||
[[Category:1562 works]] |
[[Category:1562 works]] |
||
Latest revision as of 06:58, 5 September 2024
The Helvetic Confessions are two documents expressing the common belief of Reformed churches, especially in Switzerland, whose primary author was the Swiss Reformed theologian Heinrich Bullinger. The First Helvetic Confession (1536) contributed to the confessional unity of the Protestant cantons of Switzerland against the Roman Catholic cantons, whereas the Second Helvetic Confession (1566) contributed to the confessional unity of Reformed churches across Europe, particularly due to the patronage it received from Frederick III, Elector Palatine, who had it translated into German.[1]: 635 [2]
First Helvetic Confession
[edit]The First Helvetic Confession (Latin: Confessio Helvetica prior), known also as the Second Confession of Basel, was drawn up in Basel in 1536 by Heinrich Bullinger and Leo Jud of Zurich, Kaspar Megander of Bern, Oswald Myconius and Simon Grynaeus of Basel, Martin Bucer and Wolfgang Capito of Strasbourg, with other representatives from Schaffhausen, St Gall, Mühlhausen and Biel. Bucer and Capito in particular aimed to reconcile Reformed and Lutheran doctrine through the Confession.[3]: 203 The first draft was written in Latin and the Zurich delegates objected to its Lutheran phraseology. However, Leo Jud's German translation was accepted by all, and after Myconius and Grynaeus had modified the Latin form, both versions were agreed to and adopted on February 26, 1536.[2] Bucer and Capito brought the Confession to Martin Luther as a symbol of Reformed-Lutheran unity, but he ultimately rejected it.[4]
The first five articles affirm the Protestant doctrine of sola scriptura, viewing Holy Scripture as its own interpreter, containing all that is necessary to know for salvation (sufficiency) and supremely authoritative over all other human writings. Article VI treats of the Trinity of persons in one divine essence. Articles VII-X discuss God's creation of man in his image; the most noble of creatures, which fell into sin by the original sin of Adam, and God's eternal plan of salvation for fallen man. [3]: 203 Articles XI-XIV teach that we are saved by God's grace through Christ through faith alone. Articles XV-XX treat of the Church, its authority and the office of the ministry. Articles XXI-XXIII are distinctly Reformed in sacramentology, regarding baptism and the Lord's supper as 'holy symbols of high mysteries, not mere or empty signs, but significant signs accompanying spiritual realities; in Baptism, water is the sign, regeneration and adoption the reality; in the Supper the bread and wine are signs, communion of the body and blood of the Lord is the spiritual reality'.[3]: 204 Finally, Articles XXIV-XXVIII treat of public worship, ceremonies, marriage and schism.
Second Helvetic Confession
[edit]The Second Helvetic Confession (Latin: Confessio Helvetica posterior) was written by Bullinger in 1562 and revised in 1564 as a private exercise. It came to the notice of Elector Palatine Frederick III, who had it translated into German and published.[2] The Confession was attractive to some Reformed leaders as a corrective to what they saw as the overly Lutheran statements of the Strasbourg Consensus. An attempt was made in early 1566 to have all the churches of Switzerland sign the Second Helvetic Confession as a common statement of faith.[5] It gained a favorable hold on the Swiss churches, who had found the First Confession too short and too Lutheran.[2] However, 'the Basel clergy refused to sign the confession, stating that although they found no fault with it, they preferred to stand by their own Basel Confession of 1534.'[5] Due to this near-universal approval in Reformed Switzerland, Frederick presented it to the Diet of Augsburg of 1566 as an authoritative document representing the international Reformed faith.[3]: 208 According to W. A. Curtis, 'In theological ability and in doctrinal interest few Confessions can bear comparison with it [...] it would be difficult to conceive of a theological manifesto, or compendium of doctrine, more attractive in form and matter, more lucid, effective, and shrewd, more loyal to Scripture, or more instinct with common sense.'[3]: 208
Contents
[edit]Chapters 1 and 2 treat of the doctrine of Scripture as the sole infallible authority (sola scriptura), regarding it as its own interpreter, and subjecting all other human writings (traditional or Patristic) to the standard of the Bible.[3]: 209 Chapter 3 confesses the Trinity of persons in the one divine essence and accepts the Apostles' Creed, condemning 'Jews and Mohammedans and all who blaspheme this holy and adorable Trinity,' and 'all heretics who deny the deity of Christ and the Holy Ghost.'[3]: 210 Chapter 4 expresses iconoclasm and condemns images of God or Christ. Chapter 5 rejects the invocation of saints, 'nevertheless we neither despise nor undervalue the saints, but honour them as the members of Christ and the friends of God who have gloriously overcome the flesh and the world; we love them as brethren and hold them up as examples of faith and virtue, desiring to dwell with them eternally in heaven and to rejoice with them in Christ.'[3]: 210 Chapter 6 establishes the characteristically Reformed doctrine of divine providence, while allowing for secondary causes operating within God's sovereignty; 'we disapprove of the rash words of those who say that our efforts and endeavours are vain.'[3]: 210 Chapters 7-9 teach that man consists of two substances: body and soul (bipartite view); the latter of which is said to be immortal, 'We condemn those who deny immortality, or affirm the sleep of the soul, or teach that it is a part of God.'[3]: 210 The creation of man by God as upright is detailed, along with the original sin and the total depravity for all of humanity which it entails. Only those who are regenerate are considered free from, 'being moved by the Spirit of God to do of themselves what they do',[3]: 210 although the unregenerate remain wilful slaves to unrighteousness. Chapter 10 on predestination has been interpreted as 'moderate Calvinism' or Augustinianism, and emphasises Christians' assurance of predestination through communion with Christ, 'We shall have a sufficient testimony of being written in the book of life if we live in communion with Christ, and if in true faith He is ours and we are His.'[3]: 210–211 The chapter references Philippians 2:13, For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure. Chapter 11, besides confessing the hypostatic union of Christ's human and divine nature, accepts 'believingly and reverently the communication of properties, which is deduced from Scripture and employed by the universal ancient Church in explaining and reconciling passages apparently in contradiction.'[3]: 211 Chapter 14 describes the Protestant doctrine of penitence.
It is sufficient to confess our sins to God in private and in the public service; it is not necessary to confess to a priest, for this is nowhere commanded in the Scriptures; although we may seek counsel and comfort from a minister of the gospel in times of distress and trial (cf. Jas. v. 16). The keys of the kingdom of heaven, out of which the Papists forge swords, sceptres, and crowns, are given to all legitimate ministers of the Church in the preaching of the Gospel and the maintenance of discipline (Matt. xvi. 19; John xx. 23; Mark xvi. 15; 2 Cor. v. 18, 19). We condemn the lucrative Popish doctrines of penance and indulgences, and apply to them Peter's word to Simon Magus, Thy money perish with thee.[3]: 211
,_RP-P-1908-3814.jpg)
Chapter 16 describes the nature of faith as no mere opinion or persuasion, but rather a free gift of God and the source of good works. Chapter 17 explicitly espouses the doctrine of the Church invisible, 'The Church may be called invisible, not that the men composing it are invisible, but because they are known only to God, while we are often mistaken in our judgment: those who separate from that true Church cannot live before God. [...] As there was no salvation out of the ark of Noah, so there is no certain salvation out of Christ, who exhibits Himself to the elect in the Church for their nourishment.'[3]: 211 Chapter 18 espouses presbyterian polity in claiming that the offices of presbyter and bishop were one in the Apostolic Church. Ministers are expected to be learned although 'innocent simplicity may be more useful than haughty learning.'[3]: 212 Chapter 19 defines the two sacraments as 'sacred rites instituted by God as signs and seals of His promises [cf. Romans 4:11] for the strengthening of our faith, and as pledges on our part of our consecration to Him.'[3]: 212
Of the five 'Popish' innovations, confirmation and extreme unction are dismissed while repentance, ordination and marriage are said to be divine institutions rather than sacraments. The chapter makes a difference between the sign and thing signified of the sacraments, and thus the dependance of the efficacy of the sacraments upon God's faithfulness rather than the minister's (ex opere operato). Chapter 21 states that the body of Christ is in heaven, and therefore our worship must be directed towards heaven, although Christ is spiritually present in us, and thus condemns the Eucharistic adoration of the Roman Catholic mass, 'The Mass—whatever it may have been in ancient times—has been turned from a salutary institution into a vain show and surrounded with various abuses which justify its abolition.'[3]: 212 Chapter 24 states that the Sabbath is 'observed in Christian freedom, not with Jewish superstition.'[3]: 212 Liturgical feasts in honour of saints are rejected. Fasting and self-denial are encouraged and seen as spiritually profitable so long as they are prompted by humility and not by the desire for merit. Chapter 27, in alignment with the regulative principle of worship, states that 'the more of human rites are accumulated in the Church, the more it is drawn away from Christian liberty and from Christ Himself, while the ignorant seek in ceremonies what they should seek in Christ through faith.'[3]: 213 Chapter 30 confesses the legitimacy of the civil magistrate as God's appointed servant, 'to preserve peace and public order, to promote and protect religion and good morals [...] to punish offenders against society, such as thieves, murderers, oppressors, blasphemers, and incorrigible heretics (if they are really heretics). [...] We condemn the Anabaptists who maintain that a Christian should not hold a civil office, that the magistrate has no right to punish any one by death, or to make war or to demand an oath.'[3]: 213 The chapter further states that 'Wars are only justifiable in self-defence and after all efforts at peace have been exhausted.'[3]: 213
Reception
[edit]The Second Helvetic Confession was adopted by the Reformed Church not only throughout Switzerland but in Scotland (1566), Hungary (1567), France (1571), and Poland (1578).[3]: 208 Along with the Thirty-nine Articles, the Westminster Confession of Faith, the Scots Confession and the Heidelberg Catechism is one the most generally recognized confessions of the Reformed Church.[2] According to Dezső Buzogány, 'the Confession had a vital part in [Hungarian Reformed] church life in the 17th and 18th centuries. While the Heidelberg Catechism played a major role in educating the congregation and the children in matters of faith, the Second Helvetic Confession was significant in the formation and instruction of future clergymen.'[1]: 640 The Hungarian Reformed Synod of Buda of 1791 formally rejected the Enlightenment and the Counter-Reformation, as well as the teachings of Christian Wolff, ordering schools to teach the Helvetic Confession as part of the official curriculum.[1]: 639–640 The Second Helvetic Confession was also included in the United Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A.'s Book of Confessions, in 1967, and remains in the Book of Confessions adopted by the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.).[6]
Mariology
[edit]Mary is mentioned several times in the Second Helvetic Confession, which expounds Bullinger's mariology. Chapter 3 quotes the angel's message to the Virgin Mary, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee (Luke 1:35), as an indication of the existence of the Holy Spirit and the Trinity. The Latin text described Mary as diva, indicating her rank as a person, who dedicated herself to God. In Chapter 9, the Jesus Christ is said to be conceived by the Holy Spirit and born without the participation of any man. The Second Helvetic Confession accepted the 'Ever Virgin' notion from John Calvin, which spread throughout much of Europe with the approbation of this document in the above-mentioned countries.[7] Bullinger's 1539 polemical treatise against idolatry[8] expressed his belief that Mary's 'sacrosanctum corpus' ('sacrosanct body') had been assumed into heaven by angels:
For this reason we believe that the Virgin Mary, Begetter of God, the most pure bed and temple of the Holy Spirit, that is, her most holy body, was carried to heaven by angels.[9][10]
See also
[edit]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c Buzogány, Dezső (2021). "The Influence of the Second Helvetic Confession on the Hungarian Reformed Church Life in Transylvania". In Albisser, Ariane; Opitz, Peter (eds.). Die Zürcher Reformation in Europa [The Zurich Reformation in Europe] (in German). Theologischer Verlag Zürich. ISBN 9783290183042.
- ^ a b c d e One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Helvetic Confessions". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 13 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 253.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w Curtis, William A. (1911). A History of Creeds and Confessions of Faith in Christendom and Beyond. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
- ^ Wedgeworth, Steven (2022-07-28). "Adiaphora in The First Helvetic Confession". Ad Fontes. Retrieved 2024-03-25.
- ^ a b Burnett, Amy Nelson. 1992. "Simon Sulzer and the Consequences of the 1563 Strasbourg Consensus in Switzerland" in Archive for Reformation History 83: 154–179, p. 178
- ^ Book of Confessions Study Edition. Louisville, Kentucky: Geneva Press. 1999. ISBN 978-0-664-50012-2.
- ^ Chavannes 426
- ^ De origine erroris libri duo (On the Origin of Error, Two Books) [1]. "In the De origine erroris in divorum ac simulachrorum cultu he opposed the worship of the saints and iconolatry; in the De origine erroris in negocio Eucharistiae ac Missae he strove to show that the Catholic conceptions of the Eucharist and of celebrating the Mass were wrong. Bullinger published a combined edition of these works in 4 ° (Zürich 1539), which was divided into two books, according to themes of the original work." The Library of the Finnish nobleman, royal secretary and trustee Henrik Matsson (ca. 1540–1617), Terhi Kiiskinen Helsinki: Academia Scientarium Fennica (Finnish Academy of Science), 2003, ISBN 951-41-0944-9 ISBN 9789514109447, p. 175 [2]
- ^ "146 [146] – Caput XVI. – Seitenansicht – Astronomie-rara". 2011-08-11. page 70 (thumbnail 146). Archived from the original on 2011-08-11. Retrieved 2023-04-26.
- ^ Tavard, George Henry (1996). The Thousand Faces of the Virgin Mary. Liturgical Press. p. 109. ISBN 978-0-8146-5914-4.
External links
[edit]- The Second Helvetic Confession in English Translation
- Text of the creeds from Schaff's Creeds of Christendom (vol. 3) at the Christian Classics Ethereal Library:
- The First Helvetic Confession (in its original Latin and High German translation)
- The Second Helvetic Confession (in its original Latin)
- History of the creeds from Schaff's Creeds of Christendom (vol. 1) at the Christian Classics Ethereal Library:
