User talk:Number 57: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 16:44, 22 October 2024

Click here to leave a new message.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18

This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Question

You might know this better than me since you are very knowledgable on election pages, so I have a question:

Would any election page stand a chance of passing a good article review if 1.) it has incomplete results and/or 2.) the article relies heavily on one source. The 1895 Salvadoran presidential election fits both of these since the vice presidential table is woefully incomplete (it's even missing a candidate) and its narrative is heavily reliant on Ching's book; I know that a lot of these other old Salvadoran elections will be like this, if there is even information available regarding them. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 00:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see there being an issue with the results being incomplete given it is a historic election. Re the sourcing, at the moment I don't feel it is too heavily reliant on Ching; however, I should say that I have not done a GA review before, so I am not entirely sure that reviewers would agree. Sorry to not be able to give you a better answer – you are better off asking someone with GA review experience. Cheers, Number 5 7 15:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the only source that exists on the topic, then it's not an issue. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |archive = User talk:Number 57/Archive %(counter)d
 }}{{Archives|auto=yes|search=yes}}
+== Question ==
-== https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/AFC_Crewe_(2nd_nomination) DELETION ==
+You might know this better than me since you are very knowledgable on election pages, so I have a question:
-The club played in the FA Cup yesterday?
+Would any election page stand a chance of passing a good article review if 1.) it has incomplete results and/or 2.) the article relies heavily on one source. The [[1895 Salvadoran presidential election]] fits both of these since the vice presidential table is woefully incomplete (it's even missing a candidate) and its narrative is heavily reliant on Ching's book; I know that a lot of these other old Salvadoran elections will be like this, if there is even information available regarding them. [[User:PizzaKing13|<span style="background:#0047AB;border-radius:9999px;padding:1px 8px;color:white;"><span style="background-color:#0047AB;color:#F8BF45">'''PizzaKing13'''</span></span>]] ([[User talk:PizzaKing13|''¡Hablame!'']]) 🍕👑 00:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
-How is this not relevant especially with this being a a big factor in what makes the club notable?
+:I don't see there being an issue with the results being incomplete given it is a historic election. Re the sourcing, at the moment I don't feel it is too heavily reliant on Ching; however, I should say that I have not done a GA review before, so I am not entirely sure that reviewers would agree. Sorry to not be able to give you a better answer – you are better off asking someone with GA review experience. Cheers, [[User:Number 57|<span style="color: orange;">Number</span>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<span style="color: green;">5</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<span style="color: blue;">7</span>]] 15:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
+::If that's the only source that exists on the topic, then it's not an issue. [[User:Vacant0|<span style="color:#5E9A4A;font-weight:bold">Vacant</span><span style="color:#A24B4B;font-weight:bold">0</span>]] <span style="font-size:small">([[User talk:Vacant0|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Vacant0|contribs]])</span> 15:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
-Regards [[User:Iblethebible|Iblethebible]] ([[User talk:Iblethebible|talk]]) 09:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
-:No, it didn't play in the FA Cup; the results from the weekend's games are listed [[2024–25_FA_Cup_qualifying_rounds#First_qualifying_round|here]]. [[User:Number 57|<span style="color: orange;">Number</span>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<span style="color: green;">5</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<span style="color: blue;">7</span>]] 15:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
-::The womens team played as the article stated. The games listed are listed here: [[2024–25 Women's FA Cup|2024–25 Women's FA Cup - Wikipedia]] [[User:Iblethebible|Iblethebible]] ([[User talk:Iblethebible|talk]]) 08:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
-:::This isn't relevant to the discussion; the consensus you refer to (playing in the FA Cup, FA Trophy, FA Amateur Cup or FA Vase) is for men's football. [[User:Number 57|<span style="color: orange;">Number</span>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<span style="color: green;">5</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<span style="color: blue;">7</span>]] 15:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
-::::Whats the consensus for the womens team? [[User:Iblethebible|Iblethebible]] ([[User talk:Iblethebible|talk]]) 16:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
-== Canvassing ==
-Can you notify editors who are active and invested in this page to the discussion in good faith? I'll probably end up making some other mistake in the process. [[User:Zlad!|Zlad!]] ([[User talk:Zlad!|talk]]) 22:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
-:Idk I did it as neutrally as I knew how. Hopefully this counts. [[User:Zlad!|Zlad!]] ([[User talk:Zlad!|talk]]) 23:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
-== html tables ==
-can you please stop replacing infoboxes on elections with html tables, you can full results in a full results tab [[User:Hthompson2000|Hthompson2000]] ([[User talk:Hthompson2000|talk]]) 00:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
-== Election box ==
-Cease the absolute bafoonery of reverting every single election box displaying key information such as leader seat, popular vote, etc.
-Just because you DONT LIKE the format doesnt mean that every election box format has to be reverted to the one you're liking (without even widespread consensus)
-Cheers [[User:VosleCap|VosleCap]] ([[User talk:VosleCap|talk]]) 09:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)