Jump to content

User talk:Number 57: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Number 57/Archive 18) (bot
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
|archive = User talk:Number 57/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = User talk:Number 57/Archive %(counter)d
}}{{Archives|auto=yes|search=yes}}
}}{{Archives|auto=yes|search=yes}}
== Reporting a User ==
== Question ==


You might know this better than me since you are very knowledgable on election pages, so I have a question:
How do you report a user for using their own logos of political parties? [[User:Mupper-san|Mupper-san]] has been uploading logos they've created onto Japanese political pages. [[:File:New Party Sakigake logo.svg|New Sakigake Party's logo was created by them]], while the old logo image has been deleted, [https://i.namu.wiki/i/PsHs8xcC7aTiE4N7ycv4FchMEw1ajxen3z92LgX5ofoVGTTgMzCQHE9QzPw-ZDpbqK6S6VvjS3pHbTiPQdaNVN_nJ6CRnQquUiTBDwaILXGpFlKI9dByzAaUQTt63OWoXSB2Uu39SpqEE6EZCaVyHw.webp which looked like this]. [[User:ValenciaThunderbolt|ValenciaThunderbolt]] ([[User talk:ValenciaThunderbolt|talk]]) 12:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)


Would any election page stand a chance of passing a good article review if 1.) it has incomplete results and/or 2.) the article relies heavily on one source. The [[1895 Salvadoran presidential election]] fits both of these since the vice presidential table is woefully incomplete (it's even missing a candidate) and its narrative is heavily reliant on Ching's book; I know that a lot of these other old Salvadoran elections will be like this, if there is even information available regarding them. [[User:PizzaKing13|<span style="background:#0047AB;border-radius:9999px;padding:1px 8px;color:white;"><span style="background-color:#0047AB;color:#F8BF45">'''PizzaKing13'''</span></span>]] ([[User talk:PizzaKing13|''¡Hablame!'']]) 🍕👑 00:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
:The same also goes for the logo of the [[Liberal Party (Japan, 1998)|1998 Liberal Party]], [https://www.jiji.com/jc/d4?p=ssh001-jpp01424700&d=d4_pol whose font is actually white, not black]. [[User:ValenciaThunderbolt|ValenciaThunderbolt]] ([[User talk:ValenciaThunderbolt|talk]]) 12:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
:I don't see there being an issue with the results being incomplete given it is a historic election. Re the sourcing, at the moment I don't feel it is too heavily reliant on Ching; however, I should say that I have not done a GA review before, so I am not entirely sure that reviewers would agree. Sorry to not be able to give you a better answer – you are better off asking someone with GA review experience. Cheers, [[User:Number 57|<span style="color: orange;">Number</span>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<span style="color: green;">5</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<span style="color: blue;">7</span>]] 15:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:ValenciaThunderbolt|ValenciaThunderbolt]] Speaking on the New Sakigake Party logo, this is simply a vectorisation of the image you provided but with colours adjusted to match [https://www.jiji.com/jc/d4?p=ssh001-jpp07070860&d=d4_pol this image]. On the Liberal Party, it's entirely possible to simply change the colour from black to white in a case where the difference is as such (most likely I was working off of the board in the background). Neither of these are my "own logos" by any stretch and I don't quite understand why you're saying so.
::If that's the only source that exists on the topic, then it's not an issue. [[User:Vacant0|<span style="color:#5E9A4A;font-weight:bold">Vacant</span><span style="color:#A24B4B;font-weight:bold">0</span>]] <span style="font-size:small">([[User talk:Vacant0|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Vacant0|contribs]])</span> 15:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
:[[User:Mupper-san|Mupper-san]] ([[User talk:Mupper-san|talk]]) 14:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
::{{ping|Mupper-san}} NSP isn't a simple vectorisation, as parts of the image are different compared to the logo. The star, the coloured dots (which are supposed to be circular), and the brushstroke in the center of the image is supposed to be sharp end (where the teardrop is). [[User:ValenciaThunderbolt|ValenciaThunderbolt]] ([[User talk:ValenciaThunderbolt|talk]]) 15:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:ValenciaThunderbolt|ValenciaThunderbolt]] At [https://web.archive.org/web/19970430085833/http://www.coara.or.jp/~sakigake/ the party's website], the red and green circles are unevenly shaped (though I will concede that this could absolutely be an imperfection caused by the poor quality of the picture). The brushstroke on the teardrop shape wouldn't be hard to fix, and the star was difficult but I'll try my best to make it look closer to the image later today.
:::[[User:Mupper-san|Mupper-san]] ([[User talk:Mupper-san|talk]]) 15:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
::::{{Ping|Mupper-san}} I do apologise, as it looks like you were right about the logo. The only difference with the logo, compared to the one you first uploaded, was the star. Could you alter the first version of the image you uploaded, with the start of the second version of the file? [https://www.jiji.com/news/handmade/topic/d4_pol/tkm826-jpp07070860.jpg I found another image of it]. I'm thinking now that the dark blue version isn't real, as I can't find it anywhere, and [https://img.cf.47news.jp/public/photo/a835ea81ccb319562e89f5e8d710df37/photo.jpg I can't find an image of the logo with English text, only this one with Japanese text]. [[User:ValenciaThunderbolt|ValenciaThunderbolt]] ([[User talk:ValenciaThunderbolt|talk]]) 12:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:44, 22 October 2024

Welcome Click here to leave a new message.

Question

[edit]

You might know this better than me since you are very knowledgable on election pages, so I have a question:

Would any election page stand a chance of passing a good article review if 1.) it has incomplete results and/or 2.) the article relies heavily on one source. The 1895 Salvadoran presidential election fits both of these since the vice presidential table is woefully incomplete (it's even missing a candidate) and its narrative is heavily reliant on Ching's book; I know that a lot of these other old Salvadoran elections will be like this, if there is even information available regarding them. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 00:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see there being an issue with the results being incomplete given it is a historic election. Re the sourcing, at the moment I don't feel it is too heavily reliant on Ching; however, I should say that I have not done a GA review before, so I am not entirely sure that reviewers would agree. Sorry to not be able to give you a better answer – you are better off asking someone with GA review experience. Cheers, Number 57 15:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If that's the only source that exists on the topic, then it's not an issue. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 15:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]