Jump to content

Domestic violence: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 147: Line 147:




Activism, initiated by advocates and feminist groups, has lead to a better understanding of the scope and effects of domestic violence, and has brought about changes in the criminal justice system's response. In 1981, the Duluth Project became the first multi-disciplinary response to the issue of domestic violence. This experiment, conducted in Duluth, MN, involved coordinating the response of agencies who deal with domestic situations. This program has become a model for other jurisdictions seeking to deal more effectively with domestic violence. More and more jurisdictions are mandating that suspects in domestic violence situations be arrested if there is probable cause to believe that an assault occurred. The courts are evaluating these situations more carefully and are considering the victim's safety as part of their overall decision making process. Victim advocates are intervening directly with victims, providing them with counseling about the court process, restraining orders and safety plans. Corrections/probation agencies in many areas are supervising domestic violence offenders more closely and are also paying closer attention to the victim's needs and safety issues.
Activism, initiated by victim advocates and feminist groups, has lead to a better understanding of the scope and effects of domestic violence, and has brought about changes in the criminal justice system's response. In 1981, the Duluth Project became the first multi-disciplinary response to the issue of domestic violence. This experiment, conducted in Duluth, MN, involved coordinating the actions of agencies who deal with domestic situations. The policies and activities of diverse elements of the system, from police officers on the street to shelters for battered women, were coordinated with each other. This program has become a model for other jurisdictions seeking to deal more effectively with domestic violence. More and more jurisdictions are mandating that suspects in domestic violence incidents be arrested if there is probable cause to believe that an assault occurred. The courts are evaluating these situations more carefully and are considering the victim's safety as part of their overall decision making process. Victim advocates are intervening directly with victims, providing them with counseling about the court process, restraining orders and safety plans. Corrections/probation agencies in many areas are supervising domestic violence offenders more closely and are also paying closer attention to the victim's needs and safety issues.





Revision as of 14:51, 27 December 2001

Introduction

Domestic Violence is, by barest definition, violence within a home. Beyond this, the term has a range of definitions, more and less formal, which are frequently used with little awareness that that range of definitions exists. Those definitions basically include the following elements:


Domestic

  • Relationship


    • romantic relationships including marriages, cohabitation, and dating relationships, sexual and nonsexual, exclusive or nonexclusive, heterosexual or homosexual



Violence

  • physical violence
    • direct physical violence, ranging from murder and rape to unwanted physical contact.


    • indirect physical violence, including destruction of objects, throwing objects near the victim, harm to animals


  • mental/emotional violence


    • verbal threats of physical violence to the victim, the self, or others including children, ranging from explicit, detailed and impending to implicit and vague as to both content and time frame


    • verbal violence, including threats, insults, put-downs, attacks,


    • nonverbal threats, including gestures, facial expressions, body postures




The term replaced the terms "wife beating" or "wife battering" which came before, and has begun to be replaced, to some degree, with more descriptive terms such as "relationship violence", "domestic abuse", and "violence against women". The term has been defined legally in some jurisdictions, which can add further confusion when members of the justice system meets up with domestic violence advocates.


Cycle of Violence

Frequently, the term is used to describe specific violent and overtly abusive incidents, and legal definitions will tend to take this perspective. However, when violent and abusive behaviors happen within a relationship, the effects of those behaviors continue after these overt incidents are over. Advocates and counselors will refer to domestic violence as a pattern of behaviors, including those listed above.


Lenore Walker presented the model of a "Cycle of Violence" which consists of three basic phases:


Honeymoon Phase
Characterized by affection, apology, apparent end of violence.
Tension Building Phase
Characterized by poor communication, tension, fear of causing outbursts,
Acting-out Phase
Characterized by outbursts of violent, abusive incidents.


Causes

Domestic violence is caused specifically by the choice to engage in the violent or abusive behavior. A variety of factors can lead to that choice, but only in the case of truly uncontrollabe compulsions can those factors eliminate the potential to choose nonviolent and nonabusive behaviors.


Purposes

The purpose of domestic violence is not primarily to hurt or harm the victim. Rather, it is to gain or maintain power and control over the victim.


Gender

It is impossible to have a discussion of domestic violence that does not include a discussion of the role gender does or doesn't have to play in the problem. Sometimes, the discussion of gender can overwhelm any other topic, due to the degree of emotion with which the discussion of gender can attain.


Attention to domestic violence began in the women's movement as concern about wives being beaten by their husbands, and has remained a major focus in the modern feminist movement, particularly under the label "violence against women". Political opposition to the feminist movement helped push interest in discussion of women who were violent with their husbands and partners.


Conflicts have erupted regarding whether men are more abusive than women, whether men's abuse of women is worse than women's abuse of men, how and whether resources for abused women should be made available to abused men, etc. Feminists involved in the movement have been resistant to discussing female initiated violence because they see such discussions as distracting from the greater problem of male violence, and because it can be used to rationalize male violence if women are "just as bad" as men.


Studies have been carried out to explore these issues, and results have seemed somewhat contradictory. A problem in conducting such studies is the amount of silence, fear and shame that results from abuse within families and relationships. Another is that abusive patterns can tend to seem normal to those who have lived in them for a length of time. Similarly, subtle forms of abuse can be quite transparent even as they set the stage for further abuse seeming normal. Finally, inconsistent definition of what domestic violence is makes strong conclusions hard to reach when compiling the available studies. Both men and women have been arrested and convicted of assaulting their partners in both heterosexual and homosexual relationships. The bulk of these arrests has been men being arrested for assaulting women, but that has been shifting somewhat over time.


The general consensus seems to be that male on female domestic violence is more likely to result in serious injury and death. Men on average have more upper body strength and socialization that predisposes them to resort to violence more than women do, and that can give them a higher average lethality than women. However, women determined to cause harm to their male partners can use weapons to equalize whatever deficit in physical power which may be present, and can also use social constraints against men hitting women, even in self-defense, to provide them with sufficient lethality to be dangerous in conflict situations.


Publically available resources for dealing with domestic violence are predominately for women and their children who are in or are leaving violent men. Most of the remainder are for men who have been arrested for assaulting women in their lives, and generally these are made available to the men for a fee (intentionally, as part of holding them accountable for their actions), where victims resources are usually offered free of charge.


Gender roles and expectations can and do play a role in abusive situations, and exploring these roles and expectations can be helpful in addressing abusive situations, as do factors like race, class, religion, sexuality and philosophy. None of these factors cause one to abuse or another to be abused.


Statistics

Some feel that no discussion of domestic violence is complete without the airing of some statistics.


Effects of Domestic Violence

More will be added in the space.


Response to Domestic Violence

The response to domestic violence is typically a combined effort between law enforcement agencies, the courts, and corrections/probation agencies. The role of each has evolved as domestic violence has been brought more into public view. Historically, police officers, the courts and corrections agencies treated domestic violence as a personal matter. For example, police officers were often reluctant to intervene by making an arrest, and often chose instead to simply counsel the couple and/or ask one of the parties to leave the residence for the evening. This mindset of treating family violence as a personal problem permeated the system's response to the problem, and potentially allowed the perpetrator to continue acting violently.


Activism, initiated by victim advocates and feminist groups, has lead to a better understanding of the scope and effects of domestic violence, and has brought about changes in the criminal justice system's response. In 1981, the Duluth Project became the first multi-disciplinary response to the issue of domestic violence. This experiment, conducted in Duluth, MN, involved coordinating the actions of agencies who deal with domestic situations. The policies and activities of diverse elements of the system, from police officers on the street to shelters for battered women, were coordinated with each other. This program has become a model for other jurisdictions seeking to deal more effectively with domestic violence. More and more jurisdictions are mandating that suspects in domestic violence incidents be arrested if there is probable cause to believe that an assault occurred. The courts are evaluating these situations more carefully and are considering the victim's safety as part of their overall decision making process. Victim advocates are intervening directly with victims, providing them with counseling about the court process, restraining orders and safety plans. Corrections/probation agencies in many areas are supervising domestic violence offenders more closely and are also paying closer attention to the victim's needs and safety issues.


Well-known Individuals Involved in Documented Reports of Domestic Violence






/Talk