Jump to content

Talk:My-HiME (manga): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Review: new section
Undid revision 490251157 by Gabriel Yuji (talk) Reverting good faith edit. See the further reading section of the article.
Line 21: Line 21:
*'''Merge''' shallow coverage, that just acknowledge existence of ''one more spin-off'' series and no more. No strong enough assertion of its own notability in isolation of the main series so no spin-off article for it. --[[User:KrebMarkt|KrebMarkt]] ([[User talk:KrebMarkt|talk]]) 19:57, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' shallow coverage, that just acknowledge existence of ''one more spin-off'' series and no more. No strong enough assertion of its own notability in isolation of the main series so no spin-off article for it. --[[User:KrebMarkt|KrebMarkt]] ([[User talk:KrebMarkt|talk]]) 19:57, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' I vote for merging too, the Mai-Hime EXA article is too short and don't have much info about it. Unless it is possible to find related sources for it. --[[User:Vaktug|Vaktug]] ([[User talk:Vaktug|talk]]) 01:23, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' I vote for merging too, the Mai-Hime EXA article is too short and don't have much info about it. Unless it is possible to find related sources for it. --[[User:Vaktug|Vaktug]] ([[User talk:Vaktug|talk]]) 01:23, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

== Review ==

[http://web.archive.org/web/20071012220539/http://www.mangalife.com/reviews/MY-HiMEv1.htm manga life review]. --[[User:Gabriel Yuji|Gabriel Yuji]] ([[User talk:Gabriel Yuji|talk]]) 05:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:34, 2 May 2012

WikiProject iconAnime and manga Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elimination of major differences section

It seemed to be a form of a trivia article, which doesn't really help anyone reading this article. Some of the information is better suited to individual terminology entries or character pages. Also, the nomenclature could be moved to a separate page as well, along with the anime terminology. Phony Saint 03:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ironically, though perhaps unsuitable to an encyclopaedia article, that's exactly what I and likely many others read this article for. --Tyrfing 20:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Comics01.jpg

Image:Comics01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

I think that My-HiME EXA, while not notable itself may contain useful material for this article and should be merged into it. Allen4names 04:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose merge. It is notable, there two different reliable sources found so far that thought it notable enough to mention when it was coming out. Its different than the story of the anime, which is what the other manga in this series follows. Dream Focus 12:19, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge shallow coverage, that just acknowledge existence of one more spin-off series and no more. No strong enough assertion of its own notability in isolation of the main series so no spin-off article for it. --KrebMarkt (talk) 19:57, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge I vote for merging too, the Mai-Hime EXA article is too short and don't have much info about it. Unless it is possible to find related sources for it. --Vaktug (talk) 01:23, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]