User:Sean William/RfB
Voice your opinion (talk page) (5/1/1); Scheduled to end 13:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Sean William (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - Wikipedia needs more bureaucrats, and no candidate is as (un)qualified as me. I'd immediately promote Kmweber to administrator for great justice. I have said in the past that I have both the capacity and patience to perform the duties of a bureaucrat [1] and I only hope that the citizens of Wikipedia are clueful enough to promote me.
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Sean William @ 13:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as a Bureaucrat. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. Have you read the discussions on when to promote and not promote? What do you understand the criteria for promotion to be?
- A. 1) No. 2) 75% exactly. I have already written myself a script to assist the decision making process.
- 2. How would you deal with contentious nominations where a decision to promote or not promote might be criticized?
- A. The beatings will continue until morale improves.
- 3. Wikipedians expect bureaucrats to adhere to high standards of fairness, knowledge of policy and the ability to engage others in the community. Why do you feel you meet those standards?
- A. Ignore the "Why" for a minute. Short answer: no. Long answer: nnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooooo!
- 4. Do you have the time and do you have the desire to visit WP:RFA, WP:B/RFA, and/or WP:CHU on a regular basis to attend to those requests?
- A. See question 3.
Mandatory Question from User:Pedro
- 5. Upon the succesful passing of the RFB, which is guaranteed, will you also then grant me and anyone else who asks 'crat tools? Hint: To garner my support you have to answer yes in the space neatly provided below. Pedro : Chat 13:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- A. this is where you type the word yes Ahem, yes. Did I do it right? Sean William @ 15:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- 6. Should all users be bureaucrats? If not, why not? Majorly (talk) 15:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- A. When everyone's a bureaucrat, then nobody's a bureaucrat. Sean William @ 15:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
General comments
- See Sean William's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil.
Discussion
Support
- Support, outstanding. Neıl ☎ 13:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Let's prove it to him that we are clueful, if that's what he's asking for, he can have that! Dorftrottel (harass) 13:24, April 1, 2008
- Support - I have a clue. Wisdom89 (T / C) 15:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support He is my profit. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me Articles touched by my noodly appendage 15:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Anthøny 15:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support per Kurt and Neil. User:Essjay User talk:K
Oppose
- This user is a sockpuppet of 127.0.0.1. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 14:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)