User talk:Lukt64

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello Lukt64! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Chongkian (talk) 00:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Concern regarding Draft:Daoud Yaya Brahim

Hello, Lukt64. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daoud Yaya Brahim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Hello, Lukt64,

Please do not move articles around multiple times. It's disruptive and it looks like you aren't sure what you are doing. Do not move a page on a whim, consider whether or not a move is called for and move a page ONCE.

If you have questions, please take them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:54, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wasnt intentional lol, I messed up the page name. Sorry for the inconvenience, have a nice day! Lukt64 (talk) 23:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, understood. Thanks for the explanation. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 India-Canada Tensions (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dwaipayanc was:

Minimal content. The article needs to be improved for being in the mainspace.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 India-Canada Tensions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dwaipayan (talk) 18:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lukt64! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dwaipayan (talk) 18:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Derna dam collapses. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — AP 499D25 (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2023 Venice bus crash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Venice bus crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Venice bus crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Panamitsu (talk) 21:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Mumbai residential building fire moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2023 Mumbai residential building fire. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 16:06, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited War in Sudan (2023), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sudanese Civil War. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Somali Civil War (1988–1992) (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Voorts was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm not seeing a reliable source substantiating why the periodization from 1988–1992 is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Somali Civil War (1988–1992) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

voorts (talk/contributions) 22:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting discussion for Hardeep Singh Nijjar

An article that been involved with (Hardeep Singh Nijjar ) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (2023 Canada–India diplomatic crisis). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. 2402:A00:152:85D3:61B4:3AA2:6876:1690 (talk) 16:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for War in Sudan (2023)

On 12 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article War in Sudan (2023), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

Just wondering if you're aware that you can "reply" to the nomination itself, not just to the most recent comment on it. I've noticed that you seem to reply to the most recent comment on the nomination, which makes your comments look like replies to others' comments. JM (talk) 18:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I used to use forums all the time so its just instinct for me. Lukt64 (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2023 Plateau State massacres

On 28 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Plateau State massacres, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 03:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"2023 Belgorod incident" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2023 Belgorod incident has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 31 § 2023 Belgorod incident until a consensus is reached. HappyWith (talk) 04:53, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of engagements during the Myanmar Civil War moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of engagements during the Myanmar Civil War. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 10:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. – Hilst [talk] 23:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lukt64,

Some of your article page moves on this subject were reverted. In the future, when considering moving such high profile articles to a different page title, start a discussion on the article talk page to gain consensus. These discussions have to run at least a week unless it's a case of a SNOW closure. Doing this first will prevent these instances of article page moves and later reverts. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 conflict in Ecuador

Please stop reinserting the file c:File:2024 Ecuador Conflict.svg to the article, you have been reverted by multiple editors but aren't relenting. This file lacks any kind of source what so ever. Further reverts will have to involve administrators intervention. Ecrusized (talk) 19:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SO HAVE YOU FIXED THE EN DASH?

Don't worsen an article to pursue your agenda. If the dash is not fixed today I'l revert again. Tony (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

....What? Lukt64 (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What "agenda"? Im not pursuing an agenda, why are you being agressive over something agreed upon on other pages of conflicts? Lukt64 (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOSDASH. READ IT AND FIX YOUR VANDALISM. Tony (talk) 23:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is it getting mad over? If anything, you are the one vandalizing it. I found exactly Zero dashes that arent manual of style. Lukt64 (talk) 23:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2024 Bashkortostan protests

On 24 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Bashkortostan protests, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of an attack page

A page you created has been deleted because it was a biography of a living person that was entirely negative in tone and unsourced, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe) 18:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The template above omits page names in case they are also problematic, so to be clear, this regards User:Lukt64/Donald Trump (intentional bias), which contained multiple BLP-violating statements about Trump. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe) 18:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lukt64/bets

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Lukt64/bets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Hilst [talk] 18:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lukt64. The deletion nomination was (correctly) contested by Pppery, due to you having too many edits outside of userspace for U5 to apply. However, I advise you to tag it for deletion with {{db-author}}, as it goes against WP:UP#GOALS. Thanks. – Hilst [talk] 18:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I have no reason to contest it. I kind of want it deleted, doesnt fit for wikipedia. Lukt64 (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then please place {{db-author}} at the top of the bets page. – Hilst [talk] 19:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2024 Iraq clashes

The article 2024 Iraq clashes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS. Single sentence article that does not provide any information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ecrusized (talk) 23:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ecrusized (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2023 India-Canada Tensions

Hello, Lukt64. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 India-Canada Tensions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Finding consensus at Talk:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza

Hey, thanks for pitching in at Talk:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza. More attention on the subject can help the community come to a reasonable decision. But I noticed the input you provided is based on your personal analysis of the subject. This type of input can be counterproductive, because consensus on Wikipedia should be based on reliable sources and policy-based arguments. In the case of a page move, arguments should be based on what the subject is explicitly called in reliable sources, not what individual editors understand or determine it to be. Personal interpretation or analysis is generally given little to no weight when determining the results of the discussion. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2023 Mumbai residential building fire

Hello, Lukt64. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 Mumbai residential building fire, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2023 India-Canada Tensions

Hello, Lukt64. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 India-Canada Tensions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pakistan conflict detailed map

Hi, just curious on which article(s) do you plan to use this template? —Saqib (talk | contribs) 11:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely Insurgency in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Insurgency in Balochistan. Lukt64 (talk) 22:59, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Russian internal conflict detailed map

First, you reverted a bunch of my edits with no reason at all. Now you insist of changing cities to contested where it makes no sense and u have no source for it whatsoever. Reverting until if and when you give a good reason for this 68.132.201.101 (talk) 16:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any sources for cities being controlled by the Freedom of Russia Legion? Lukt64 (talk) 16:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes...For grayvoron https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/may/22/anti-kremlin-militia-freedom-of-russia-legion-overrun-russian-border-village-kozinka https://www.uawire.org/russian-national-guard-special-unit-vanishes-near-grayvoron-amid-intense-fighting-in-belgorod-region https://www.newsweek.com/russia-kremlin-prisoners-belgorod-ultimatum-1879943

For Gorkovskyhttps://au.news.yahoo.com/capture-gorkovsky-village-belgorod-oblast-124200793.html#:~:text=Voice%20of%20Ukraine-,Capture%20of%20Gorkovsky%20village%20in%20Belgorod,pro%2DUkrainian%20Russian%20volunteers%20%2D%20video&text=A%20video%20from%20the%20border,social%20media%20on%20March%2018. https://kyivindependent.com/anti-kremlin-militia-siberian-battalion-announces-capture-of-gorkovsky-settlement-in-belgorod-oblast/https://mil.in.ua/en/news/liberation-forces-take-the-village-of-gorkovsky-in-the-belgorod-region/

For shebekino https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/06/04/pro-ukrainian-fighters-capture-russian-soldiers-belgorod/https://www.newsweek.com/tanks-russia-ukraine-belgorod-freedom-legion-volunteer-corps-border-1803756 https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/06/05/belgorod-russia-ukraine-counteroffensive-militias/

General source:https://www.berkshireeagle.com/opinion/columnists/james-brooke-russian-partisan-units-take-fight-inside-russia/article_5d047c36-e877-11ee-b162-67d180860598.html

I havent gone into every single town because I dont feel like doing that right now, but here a bunch @Lukt64 68.132.201.101 (talk) 17:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://charter97.org/en/news/2024/3/16/587775/ https://www.kyivpost.com/post/29814 are also helpful 68.132.201.101 (talk) 17:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I turned all the dots red provisionally until the issue of sourcing can be addressed. The guidelines at Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map/doc, which are based on the Syrian Civil War map practices, are considered best practices.

IP, I would encourage you to read our sourcing policy in detail.

Also, technically the template and module automatically fall under some pretty serious restrictions similar to those applied to the Israel—Palestine conflict (to my knowledge those are the only two areas, let’s hope it stays that way). Unfortunately, those restrictions create a walled garden where only extended-confirmed editors (500 edits/30 days) can edit, while other editors have to make talk page requests. Yeah, I know it says “an encyclopedia that anyone can edit”. I didn’t make the rules.

RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 17:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2023 Mumbai residential building fire

Hello, Lukt64. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 Mumbai residential building fire".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Johnny Buss

On 8 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Johnny Buss, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that U.S. presidential candidate Johnny Buss owns one of the oldest comedy clubs in the country? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Johnny Buss. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Johnny Buss), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coincidence

Hi @Lukt64, I was just reverting hateful edits from Occupation of the Gaza Strip by Israel but then realized you just did it after I hit publish. Thanks! Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 23:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Wad Madani (2024) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Wad Madani (2024). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:TOOSOON. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 07:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for War in Sudan (2023–present)

On 14 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article War in Sudan (2023–present), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 03:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Constitution Party National Convention, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Lukt64. Thank you for your work on 2024 Constitution Party National Convention. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Eritrea Detailed Map

Template:Eritrea Detailed Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Lukt64. Thank you for your work on Operation 0307. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Rectenwald 2024 presidential campaign for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Rectenwald 2024 presidential campaign is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Rectenwald 2024 presidential campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sal2100 (talk) 18:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chase Oliver 2024 presidential campaign for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chase Oliver 2024 presidential campaign is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chase Oliver 2024 presidential campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sal2100 (talk) 18:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Lukt64. Thank you for your work on Randall Terry 2024 presidential campaign. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Guyana Detailed Map

Template:Guyana Detailed Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Module:Guyana Detailed Map

Module:Guyana Detailed Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

empty footnote on Chase Oliver 2024 presidential campaign

Hi Lukt64! I noticed in this edit, you added the note {{Efn-ua|name=DNM}}, but it doesn't have any text. Would you take a look? = paul2520 💬 00:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Randall Terry 2024 presidential campaign for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Randall Terry 2024 presidential campaign is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randall Terry 2024 presidential campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SecretName101 (talk) 03:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Democrats who oppose the Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign

The article List of Democrats who oppose the Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Covers same info as the Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David O. Johnson (talk) 11:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2024 Fico assessination attempt

Hello Lukt64,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2024 Fico assessination attempt for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want 2024 Fico assessination attempt to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think I even made that intentionally. Lukt64 (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Lukt64. Thank you for your work on Zaïre-FPAC. Another editor, GreenLipstickLesbian, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I marked this page reviewed, and added the longer name to the lead. Thank you for writing it!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GreenLipstickLesbian}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 03:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Western Armenia Government in Exile for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Western Armenia Government in Exile, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Armenia Government in Exile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Wad Madani (2024)

Hello, Lukt64. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Wad Madani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]