Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ishwar Sharan

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 00:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ishwar Sharan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created by a friend of its subject. "Ishwar Sharan" is a common name but relevant GHits are slim & Gscholar is worse still. He and the cottage industry that surrounds him claim that there is a media blackout of their fringe theories, which have origins in & are supported by Hindu nationalists. Despite the numerous citations, those that relate to the theory itself are all published and/or written by people with high levels of controversy surrounding them. The theory itself seems to attract no mainstream support at all. I think that we are giving a lot of space to a quite extreme theory falling under WP:FRINGE here, even after toning down the language that was originally in the article. Sitush (talk) 19:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As far as notability goes, this book is interesting. It names a lot of Hindutva and Hindu nationalist theorists (and notes that most of them are not academics). Among those referred to are Sita Ram Goel, Koenraad Elst, P. N. Oak & K. D. Sethna. It also mentions the Voice of India (now the Voice of Dharma) as a Hindutva publishing house. However, despite the many names referred to, it does not mention Ishwar Sharan. Is this an indication that he is not even considered to be a notable person in these circles? Our article relies heavily on an allegedly banned interview, on the output of Goel, Elst and VoI/VoD, and on nonentities writing on non-mainstream opinion sites (such as this) & in the odd less-than-spectacular newspaper. - Sitush (talk) 22:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some info has come to light here regarding scholarly doubts for claims relating to early Christianity/St Thomas in India. Nonetheless, Sharan's views remain extreme in their depth & presentation (eg: what has the appearance of a persecution complex) and his notability questionable. - Sitush (talk) 09:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 12:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a notable subject. There are no third party reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 12:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've seen his name in a couple of places before, but there's no real WP:RS coverage of him, so doesn't pass WP:BIO. —SpacemanSpiff 13:48, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.