Jump to content

Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron – Rescue list: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Lessons learnt: Stealth deletion is for real. Nobody from the prior vote was aware or showed up.
Line 532: Line 532:


==Lessons learnt==
==Lessons learnt==
[[Yoast]]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yoast It may be kept]; [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Moz_(marketing_software) it may be deleted] later. Stealth deletion is for real. Nobody from the prior vote was aware or showed up. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 14:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yoast It may be kept]; [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Moz_(marketing_software) it may be deleted] later. Stealth deletion is for real. Nobody of the keepers from the prior vote was aware or showed up. The usual suspects voted delete. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 14:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:23, 2 August 2020


ARS Code of Conduct
  • Note that this wikiproject is only intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting votes or vote-stacking. Be sure to follow the guideline on canvassing. This means, in part, that you should use Template:Rescue list on the deletion discussion page when you list the discussion here.
  • Focus on improving content. For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic notability by adding reliable-source references with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.
  • Show the light. If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Wikipedia's deletion policy. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.
For more information about article rescue, please refer to ARS Tips to help rescue articles and ARS Rescue guide
For additional article improvement listings, check out this project's archives and listings at WikiProject Cleanup

This is a list and discussion of Wikipedia content for rescue consideration. When posting here, please be sure to:

  • First familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines for topic notability and identifying reliable sources, as well as the prohibition on inappropriate canvassing
  • Include a specific rationale why the article/content should be retained on Wikipedia, and any ideas to improve the content. Please ensure that your comment here is neutrally worded. (You can also !vote to delete an article at its deletion discussion because you think it is untenable in its present state, and still list it here in the hope that another editor will find a way to improve it and save it.)
  • You should disclose in a deletion discussion that a post has been made at the rescue list.
  • Sign posts with four tildes ~~~~.
  • Place the {{subst:rescue list|~~~~}} template in Articles for deletion discussions, to notify editors about the listing here. The tag can be placed below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

The following templates can be used for articles listed here:

  • *{{Find sources|Article name}} - Adds source search options
  • *{{lagafd|Article name}} - Adds relevant links
  • *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (2nd nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated twice
  • *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (3rd nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated 3 times
  • *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (Nth nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated N ≥ 4 times
Shortcuts


— Please post new entries at the top of the list —

Management (game)

May have references in old, out of print sources given the age of the game. BOZ (talk) 05:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infantry Attacks series

May have references in board game sources for the various games in this series. BOZ (talk) 05:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stonehenge

Here, we are mainly concerned with rescuing articles from deletion but this tends to mean that we're usually working on weak, obscure topics. But even the most vital topics are in need of assistance and here's a topical example. Stonehenge is in the news and so I just nominated it at ITN. But already there's some opposition, saying that the article doesn't have enough references. As the ARS specialises in such work, members might like to try this high-end, vital topic for a change. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? 110 references isn't enough? YGBSM 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ITN/C is a strange place. For another recent example, Carl Reiner is another vital topic with even more references but this wasn't enough for some and so the subject was denied an entry in ITN's list of recent deaths. But over a million readers read his article regardless. Go figure... Andrew🐉(talk) 12:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Been there and done that. I know. Doctor John was another one I was also involved with. Perverse thinking, IMO. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Treat

SPEEDY KEEP
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) –Deacon Vorbis

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American sportswriter, mainly in newspapers. Wrote a monumental history of American football and was an advocate for racial integration in sports. If anyone has a Newspapers.com subscription (which I do not) and would like to contribute, please do! AleatoryPonderings (talk) 20:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

List of fictional schools

This looks serious. We'll need to mobilise Dumbledore's Army, the Scooby Gang, Ferris Bueller, the Owl of the Remove, the Bash Street Gang and the hellions of St Trinians! Andrew🐉(talk) 19:43, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ASC Shipbuilding

Is this Australian Shipbuilding Company worth saving? Or ought it be merged into various parent companies? To paraphrase George Tenet, finding reliable sources should be a "slam dunk". But we know how that prediction about WMDs in Iraq worked out. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton McWhorter III

KEEP
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Mhhossein

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

File:Hamilton McWhorter.jpg
McWhorter III. Double-ace.

Another pilot is in peril. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Hamilton McWhorter III 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kept AFD closed as keep. Nomination withdrawn. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:44, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Munchausen by Internet

MERGE
The result was merge to Factitious disorder imposed on self. Sandstein

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I trimmed some of the fat, but this article still needs to go on a diet. Lightburst (talk) 19:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ludwig Bürgel

DELETE
The result was delete. Sandstein

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cary S. Cox

DELETE
The result was delete. I see this was listed for rescue by a COI editor and a bunch of rescue regulars voted to keep with assertive arguments. I'm not going to give those votes much weight. The delete side has given a detailed source analysis showing they fall short and has reviewed their votes after improvement. Consensus to delete is therefore solid Spartaz

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Looks notable to me. I have added RS Lightburst (talk) 23:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleted Per the closer: "The result was delete. I see this was listed for rescue by a COI editor and a bunch of rescue regulars voted to keep with assertive arguments. I'm not going to give those votes much weight. The delete side has given a detailed source analysis showing they fall short and has reviewed their votes after improvement. Consensus to delete is therefore solid." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ralph Tomlinson

KEEP
The result was keep. Tone

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ellwood Walter (businessman)

KEEP
The result was keep. Tone

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ellwood Walter was President of the Mercantile Mutual Insurance Company in New York for 28 years. The New York pilot boat Ellwood Walter, No. 7 was named after him. He was a trustee for the Nautical School for the harbor of New York to educate boys in seamanship and navigation. He was Vice-President of the New York Seamen’s Association. He was awarded a silver medal and money by the American Benevolent Life Saving Society of New York. I assume sourcing can be improved, although I think that it suffices. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Albanese Candy

WINNER
Made it to the main page

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Not sure that it was posted here. Had to withstand serial nominations for AFD. first nomination and 2nd nomination. But it was expanded and successfully rescued. User:Lightburst deserves a shout out. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

DYK for Albanese Candy

WINNER
Made it to the main page

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

On 20 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Albanese Candy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Albanese Candy makes gummy confectioneries in the shape of worms, snakes, butterflies, khaki-colored soldiers, and jet fighter aircraft? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Albanese Candy. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Albanese Candy), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks to 7&6=thirteen for getting so many articles that we have improved on the main page. I was excited to see the gummy bear company make it through the process! Thanks 7&6!
  1. Albanese Candy
  2. Benno Bikes
  3. Democracy Manifest
  4. Bertha Boronda
  5. Elizabeth L. Gardner
  6. Richard Haine
  7. Daniella van Graas

Lightburst (talk) 15:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I know you missed:
  1. S.W. Randall Toyes and Giftes
And probably others.
Our success at rescuing articles, expanding them, and taking them to the main page is a way to prove the worth of WP:ARS. It is the perfect answer to the self identified naysayers and disparagers. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Failure

SNOW KEEP (THAT WAS FAST)
The result was WP:SNOW keep. It is immediately clear that there will not be a consensus to delete this. BD2412

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The Hunters in the Snow by Dutch painter Pieter Bruegel

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Carmel Art Association

Joseph Henderson (pilot)

UN-KEEP
The result was keep. Spartaz

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A change is as good as a rest so here's a different sort of pilot. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Both sides make compelling arguments. Let's have some more input. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tone 17:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Andy Auld (Royal Navy officer)

UN-DYKED
Admin JzG erased the article with G4

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

*Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
*Andy Auld (Royal Navy officer) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|google) AfD discussion

not yet a 2nd afd. But it's in play. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note that three of us found our way there because its on our watchlist, before this was tagged for assistance in finding more reliable sources to prove it is notable. Dream Focus 14:04, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is all about trashing the DYK. See here. In Wikipedia and DYK, life really is a zero sum game. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Saddens me. I think Wikipedia is better with the article. And I think there can be a new local consensus---perhaps the dyk process is just that consensus. Lightburst (talk) 14:44, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It was SD and I started a thread with the admin who deleted the article -JzG Lightburst (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It was contested by three wikipedia regulars, and it was speedily deleted. Out of process by an interested party, IMO. A second AFD discussion at least should have been required. not same article that was deleted before. Surely there is a way to contest/appeal this high-handed buggery. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

List of adult animated films

This is an actual thing, and nothing to do with how American's use the word adult to refer to porn, but instead an actual genre. Need help finding more reliable sources for the entries on the list. Dream Focus 12:39, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Akron Ice House

KEEP
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:Speedy keep#1, the nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion. Malcolmxl5

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

We take refrigerators and air conditioning for granted nowadays but it wasn't always like this... Andrew🐉(talk) 11:04, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tolulope Arotile

NO CONSENSUS
The result was no consensus. I'm not seeing obvious evidence of mass canvassing here to discount opinions from experienced and long standing editors. Spartaz

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The picture's good enough for me but others want more. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Picture was copyrighted. And the AFD continues. I've posted it In the News candidates so there is some urgency in getting this resolved. But that is itself a trippy process. "You don't need a weatherman to see which way the wind blows" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In the News candidates rejected it. As I said, that is quirky, and they look for excuses to not run it. The AFD didn't help. Will do a DYK. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Did you know nominations/Tulolope Arotile 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Robert L. Birmingham

KEEP
The result was no consensus. No evidence has been shown that he meets GNG, PROF#4, or PROF#5. However, only one criterion needs to be met, and I see no consensus that he fails PROF#1 on the strength of his citations or even a weak consensus that he does. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Long time law professor. Many influential articles. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

SkyscraperCity Fifth nomination

KEEP
The result was keep. In view of additional references that provide the GNG rationale. Tone

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

  • This one is a website for tall buildings 9 world's largest online forum on skyscrapers) The article claims "As of 2019, the forum has over 1 million members, 1 million threads and over 110 million posts." Let us see what we can do to fix it. Lightburst (talk) 21:42, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ratonero Murciano de Huerta

KEEP
The result was keep; withdrawn by nominator. BD2412

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Spanish Rat terrier. I've added sources, but they are all foreign language. Spanish speakers might help. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator – notability established by Neodop. Not yet acted on. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kept Per the closer: "The result was keep; withdrawn by nominator." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Kept. But there is an ongoing discussion about purging the sources here. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Businessmen's Educational Fund

This was founded to educate business leaders about what was happening to their country – that it was becoming too "militaristic and aggressive" and that this was causing massive waste. This was a time of cover-ups and whistleblowers. Plus ça change... Andrew🐉(talk) 18:25, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

James D. Marks second nomination

DELETE
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

  • Seems I can find information rather easily. Activist, inventor: went to Columbia and has a page there. Check out his patents.

Was a keep in 2014. Lightburst (talk) 17:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Team conflict

KEEP
The result was keep. Consensus is that this subject has received a fair amount of coverage and meets notability guidelines. However, expansion and organization of the article may be necessary. (non-admin closure) ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Team players wanted. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Very erotic very violent

SPEEDY KEEP
The result was Speedy keep. Per sources added and consensus. SynergeticMaggot

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I'm not sure I'm brave enough to search for sources using these keywords. It's a dirty job but someone's got to do it! Andrew🐉(talk) 08:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Kept Per the closer: "The result was keep." The first AFD was a "speedy keep" but the second was not. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bubonic Plague of 2020

SPEEDY DELETE
The result was delete. GirthSummit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

You thought the virus was bad? The Black Death has just said "Hold my beer!" As you'll be hearing more about this, it's good to be well informed... Andrew🐉(talk) 19:05, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Freimann Hotel Building

KEEP
The result was keep. BD2412

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Newtown Hardware House

UNKNOWN
I closed the merger discussion after it was unopened and no discussion occurred in 13 days. I had a discussion with the closer about keeping the article, and the closer put a merger template on the article, discussion was not started. I asked the admin if we could close it about a week ago, and I did not get an answer so I removed the template

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This place burnt down once before but was saved. Can it be saved again? Andrew🐉(talk) 16:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is an informative article. I say any building that can be in continuous use for 151 years is encyclopedic. I started to fix it up! Lightburst (talk) 00:05, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I approached the admin and asked to reopen after he closed as merge. I have been actively working on the article. It seems the admin has now put a merger discussion on the article. Lightburst (talk) 16:00, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Beer hall

SPEEDY KEEP
The result was speedy keep. The German Wikipedia also has a couple useful sources. (non-admin closure) Reywas92)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The article is in little danger of deletion but will be enjoyable to research and expand. See also the European Beer Star. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pwn

MERGE
The result was merge to Leet#Owned and pwned. Ritchie333

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This is not just a perennial pawn in the great game. It's a chance to learn about concepts like catachresis and cacography. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2020 United States racial injustice reckoning

KEEP
The result was keep. The question is whether this is original research by synthesis. Numerically, we have 11 delete/merge and 7 keep opinions. That's no consensus so far. In terms of arguments, I think the "keep" side has the substantially stronger ones: Czar has provided numerous references in support of their view that this is not something made up by Wikipedians, but discussed as a topic in reliable sources. The subsequent "delete" opinions do not engage with these sources, e.g. to attempt to show that the "reckoning" discussed in these sources is something other than the "reckoning" discussed in this article. Instead, almost all merely assert original research without further arguments. That's not much more than a pure vote under these circumstances, and accordingly I must give it very little weight. As such, I am of the view that, going by strength of argument, rough consensus is to keep the article (possibly bordering on no consensus, but the outcome would be the same). This does not prevent editors, of course, from agreeing to rename the article if this is deemed necessary. Sandstein

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This could use attention from some experienced editors who understand AfD/article rescue. —valereee (talk) 18:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Shuvro

KEEP
The result was keep per SNOW, pace to LongRoad, but no point in wasting people's time (although it should be noted that this closure is in spite of !votes from the ARS, not because of them: they are no more convincing than usual!). But there has, apart from that, been much good work done from other editors. I suggest the sources now apparently available, particularly those in Bangladeshi, are utilised in the article to avoid the otherwise unavoidable impression of fancruftdom.
While we're at it, Timtrent, may I suggest that you adjust your signature in accordance with WP:CUSTOMSIG/P (A customised signature should make it easy to identify your username). All the best, ——Serial # 18:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure) ——Serial # 18:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This escaped into the wild too early, unreferenced. I see hope of making it pass it's current AfD if sufficient clever folk can reference it. Note the alternate spelling Shubhro Fiddle Faddle 16:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hypertime

KEEP
The result was keep. WP:HEY Ritchie333

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This is an amusing analogy for Wikipedia – a complex, shifting reality which keeps changing in a protean way but never makes complete sense while none of the versions and revisions ever really go away. The best summary I've of it seen so far is that "it's all true!". What it really means that the authors and editors can do whatever they like – just like Wikipedia, eh? Andrew🐉(talk) 19:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some more sources but whether it is enough to save it I don't know. Theroadislong (talk) 16:57, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Did you know nominations/Hypertime 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kept Per the closer: "The result was keep. WP:HEY" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Barbed Wire of Christ

REDIRECT
The result was redirect to Lubo Kristek. As a compromise between delete and merge: editors can decide what, if anything, they want to merge from the history. Sandstein

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Small penis

REDIRECT AGAINST CONSENSUS
The result was redirect to penis size; the arguments for disambiguation are correct, that the navigation needs to be served, but this can be done with or without a primary topic. Per Spicy's argument, the nav function being argued for can also be handled with a primary topic; will expand the hatnote there as well. -- JHunterJ

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I found some some good sources in Google Scholar but when I try Google Books, it suggests State of Fear! Andrew🐉(talk) 10:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Dream Focus, I now understand what Google was getting at. See small penis rule. Andrew🐉(talk) 00:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cthulhu Mythos deities

CLOSING
Closing, has been listed since 6-25-20

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

There is no pending AFD. Rather, a user is simply editing it out of existence. Doing indirectly that which he can't do directly. See Talk:Cthulhu Mythos deities article talk page. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Brian Lumley deities

REDIRECT
The result was redirect to Cthulhu Mythos deities. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Community property in the United States

KEEP
The result was keep. Editors seem to agree that was is needed is cleanup, not deletion, and are further reminded that there is no deadline. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Keep 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Meadowbrook Country Club (Chesterfield County, Virginia)

NO CONSENSUS
The result was no consensus. No further comments after the article was improved. Ritchie333

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Having a real hard time finding sources. Anybody got a newspapers.com account? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea, I also have a Newspaper account I shared with 7&6. I also improved the article a bit. Lightburst (talk) 22:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:48, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kept Per the closer: "The result was no consensus. No further comments after the article was improved." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Recreation room

SNOW KEEP
The result was keep per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) dkb

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
It's snowing in June, 3 days before Summer Solstice. Yippee! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:42, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suparatana Bencharongkul Second nomination

KEEP
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

  • A young woman who is a leader in the field of agriculture. Many of the sources are foreign language, but I managed to find quite a few english sources. The article could use our help. Lightburst (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Paul R. Gregory

SPEEDY KEEP
The result was Speedy Keep. Nominator has withdrawn, unanimous consent to Keep, helpful advice has been given, no reason to keep this up any longer. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Per the nominator: "SPEEDY KEEP Nomination withdrawn after the massive improvement of the article. It is a great pity that the article was sitting here tagged for freaking 5 years! Where have y'all been before?" Not yet closed. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 June 2020. The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep. Per the closer: "The result was Speedy Keep. Nominator has withdrawn, unanimous consent to Keep, helpful advice has been given, no reason to keep this up any longer. (non-admin closure)" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Eastern Rail Services

DELETE
The result was delete. The arguments for delete have been made with reference to policies and guidelines, and I am seeing detailed analysis of how particular sources do not meet those requirements. The keep arguments on the other hand have tended to merely assert the company is notable without detailed argument. Where specific sources have been put forward there has been a failure to explain, with reference to guidelines, how they meet the requirements, and the claims have been refuted in detail. SpinningSpark

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Seton Tuning

KEEP
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Captain Galaxy

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Trí Phải

KEEP
The result was speedy keep. Even though the discussion has almost run for a full 7 days, the deletion rationale contradicts common sense with respect to WP:NGEO so heavily that no other reasonable editor would recommend deleting the article on this ground. (non-admin closure) Juliette Han

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Southern Vietnam village. See WP:NGEO. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Artistic scandal

KEEP.
The result was keep. SpinningSpark

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Imagine if galleries allowed members of the public to destroy the works that they didn't appreciate. That would be a scandal. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Harriet Walker

DELETE
The result was delete. The keep arguments largely cite non policy based arguments Spartaz

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kısmet Press

DELETE.
The result was delete. SpinningSpark

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

—valereee (talk) 11:50, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lessons learnt

Yoast It may be kept; it may be deleted later. Stealth deletion is for real. Nobody of the keepers from the prior vote was aware or showed up. The usual suspects voted delete. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Article_Rescue_Squadron_–_Rescue_list&oldid=970812119"