Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates
Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
In the news toolbox |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers
Voicing an opinion on an itemFormat your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...
Please do not...
Suggesting updatesThere are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
December 19
December 19, 2021
(Sunday)
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
Politics and elections
|
December 18
December 18, 2021
(Saturday)
Arts and culture
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
|
RD: Richard Rogers
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYTimes
Credits:
- Nominated by Ktin (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Italian-British architect. Article requires some work but should be ready soon. Ktin (talk) 01:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I don't care about the blurb, but Rogers should be in the RD-listing right away. If it wazs good enough yesterday, today too so. -DePiep (talk) 06:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
December 17
December 17, 2021
(Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
Osaka building fire
Blurb: A building fire breaks out in Osaka, Japan, killing 27 people. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Twenty-four people die in a building fire in Osaka, Japan.
News source(s): Al Jazeera, AP, BBC, Guardian, Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk · give credit)
- Created by Love of Corey (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Worthy a blurb when expanision comes. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 14:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Article is far too short at this time, three short paragraphs is not enough for the main page. If sufficiently expanded, this may be ready for the main page, bit it is not yet. --Jayron32 14:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I didn't create this. Just did some category work. Looks like it was created by Love of Corey. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- It should be updated now. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 16:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Article looks good and will be updated over time. However, the article says 24 people died not 27 per blurb. Could we mention something about it being a suspected arson in the blurb? --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 00:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support, Except for the number of dead, which can be corrected, the article has enough information. Alex-h (talk) 08:28, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Enough info on article/well cited enough to be ITN-worthy. Fakescientist8000 (talk) 12:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Reuters, Guardian put toll at 24. – Sca (talk) 13:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support, and also information from the Fire and Disaster Management Agency (the central government agency responsible for civil defence in Japan) also states 24 deaths. It seems that the death toll has since been corrected.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:42, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support because it's important enough & the article is good enough. Jim Michael (talk) 17:28, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to go. Hanamanteo (talk) 19:15, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Not ready; article needs proper sourcing, not external links in text. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- That is a formating problem, not a sourcing problem. @Fulmard: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.94.215.241 (talk) 03:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- But citations should be in reference tags, since ITN articles are to show quality of how we work. This is a trivial fix but it does need to be donee. --Masem (t) 03:44, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- That is a formating problem, not a sourcing problem. @Fulmard: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.94.215.241 (talk) 03:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
(closed) New Prime Minister of Czech Republic
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Petr Fiala (pictured) takes office as Prime Minister of the Czech Republic as part of a coalition government. (Post)
News source(s): Aljazzera, dpa, Guardian, Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by BastianMAT (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
- Comment we've already published the formalization of the coalition... _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 14:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Weak oppose One rather long paragraph in the "political activism" section remains unreferenced. Fix that and this will be good to go. --Jayron32 14:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment he's not the head of state, as the President of the Czech Republic is, so surely this isn't ITNR? Joseph2302 (talk) 14:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- It's whomever has actual power, be it the president or the PM; it's not just head of state anymore. 331dot (talk) 14:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- According to List of current heads of state and government it's the PM, not the president, so ITNR is correct. 331dot (talk) 14:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) The policy at WP:ITNR states, "
Changes in the holder of the office which administer the executive of their respective state/government, in those countries which qualify under the criteria above, as listed at List of current heads of state and government except when that change was already posted as part of a general election.
" The prime minister of the Czech Republic is listed as the primary executive, so THAT is the position that qualifies for ITNR. --Jayron32 14:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) The policy at WP:ITNR states, "
- In line with the nomination for Bulgarian PM, we posted the result of election in October with Fiala likely PM, so this would be a duplication. I'd only support posting twice if at the time of the election it is not sure who will head the government, and then when the government is formed. --Tone 16:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose as non-ITNR Since we posted formation of the coalition with Fiala as PM,[1] this is not ITNR. GreatCaesarsGhost 16:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose as we already posted this change of government on 10 October. No need to post it again. This would be like posting the results of the US election, and posting it again on the day the President takes office. Which makes no sense. This is a stale nom, as the election was in October. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Typhoon Rai
Blurb: At least 31 people are dead after Typhoon Rai hits the Philippines. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Hundreds of thousands of people flee their homes as Typhoon Rai hits the Philippines.
News source(s): Reuters, Al-Jazeera, Washington Post GMA News NDRRMC AP News
Credits:
- Nominated by Ainty Painty (talk · give credit)
- Created by Cyclonicationly (talk · give credit)
- Updated by HurricaneEdgar (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Ainty Painty (talk) 05:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wait until impact, if any, is known. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 08:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose for now, no demonstration of an ITN-worthy impact. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wait for now it's not notable. We will talk about it when the typhoon causes, if it happens, destruction and a significant number of victims. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 10:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose not noteworthy at this stage. Nominations of this ilk should wait until the impact is well understood. Article is in very good condition. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Agree. Reuters reports toll of 12. – Sca (talk) 13:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Death toll is not more than an ordinary storm for the basin. 14:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Preceding comment posted by Hurricane Noah. – Sca (talk) 14:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support It's not about the number of deaths, it is about climate change/global warming causing severe weather events such as in the US concurrently this late in the year and extremely-rapid change to cat-5 intensity.
- I edited the blub to include super typhoon, ect. but it still feels inadequit considering the impact in my slightlt biased opinion ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- GSMC(Chief Mike) Kouklis U.S.NAVY Ret. ⛮🇺🇸 / 🇵🇭🌴⍨talk 18:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- We don't really cover events just because they may be tied to global warming. ITN is not good for superlatitive stories (eg this being the strongest storm since 20XX). We are looking at deaths and damage, not just that it happened during a period where these storms can happen in that area of the world. --Masem (t) 18:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- I removed the "super" as the designation is unofficial. Destroyeraa (Alternate account) 20:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- We don't really cover events just because they may be tied to global warming. ITN is not good for superlatitive stories (eg this being the strongest storm since 20XX). We are looking at deaths and damage, not just that it happened during a period where these storms can happen in that area of the world. --Masem (t) 18:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Death toll has risen to 12. I also added an altblurb with the death toll. Destroyeraa (Alternate account) 20:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment – Coverage on Saturday indicates a toll of 30 or more. [2] [3] [4] [5] – Sca (talk) 13:42, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support 31 deaths, php25 billion in damage. Not an "ordinary" storm for the Philippines anymore, as Odette/Rai will certainly be retired. Destroyeraa (Alternate account) 18:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Destroyeraa HurricaneEdgar 23:23, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support we've clearly passed the threshhold for significance. Article quality is good. May want to modify the blurb in coming days to indicate when/if the typhoon makes landfall in Vietnam. NorthernFalcon (talk) 00:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support as it is a significant weather event and article is good. Elijahandskip (talk) 01:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
(Closed) Log4Shell
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Log4Shell, a zero-day exploit, is publicly disclosed, possibly affecting hundreds of millions of devices. (Post)
News source(s): Ars Technica, Financial Times, Wired
Credits:
- Nominated by WMrapids (talk · give credit)
- Support Reports are calling this a major cyber incident and while the fallout is presently low (compared to something like the Ukraine cyberattacks a few years back), the resolution is not well known and its clear parties are trying to exploit it. --Masem (t) 02:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- This is somewhat stale, as it was announced on 9 December, and patched three days earlier. IT folks have been running around fixing this for more than a week and a half now. Stephen 05:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, this story is a week old. Nixinova T C 07:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose as stale. This was publicly disclosed December 9. TarkusABtalk/contrib 08:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support This still seems quite live and in the news. For example, the current BBC headline is Log4shell: US demands Christmas Eve deadline for hack fix. The talk is of "waves" just like COVID and they are just starting. This is a lot more significant than the latest bus plunge or politics in Tonga.Andrew🐉(talk) 09:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose this became public on 9 December, which would have been correct time to post on ITN. The oldest blurb on the front page is from 12 December, so this meets the ITN definition of stale. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
December 16
December 16, 2021
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
Politics and elections
|
RD: Stefan Keil
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Jamaica
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Sudden death of an ambassador, became ill in the office - article new, a start Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support article in good shape, worthy of RD. ——Serial 23:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to go. Hanamanteo (talk) 08:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
RD: Lucía Hiriart
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Count Iblis (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Count Iblis (talk) 12:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose for now her Spanish article can be used to improve the content and add the missing sources to her English page. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 13:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
RD: Bogalay Tint Aung
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Burmese RFA Burmese
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Htanaungg (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Htanaungg (talk) 08:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support historically important person in Myanmar and recipient of the highest national honours and awards. Taung Tan (talk) 05:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- A bit short with only 1622 characters (287 words) of readable prose, but ok. There are enough footnotes at expected spots. AGF on all non-English sources. This wikibio is READY for RD. --PFHLai (talk) 13:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
RD: Henry Orenstein
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [6], [7], [8]
Credits:
- Nominated by Mooonswimmer (talk · give credit)
- Created by Kicking222 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Recent death —Mooonswimmer (talk) 16:21, 16December 2021 (UTC)
- Lot of the citations are primary or iffy. However, the Newsweek ref could be used to reference a lot of that material. GreatCaesarsGhost 17:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose A lot of work needed on referencing. Pawnkingthree (talk) 02:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
(Closed) Thwaites glacier has been destabilized
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Thwaites Glacier is at risk of accelerated melting, raising global sea levels by feet within the next decades (Post)
News source(s): NBC, CIRES
Credits:
- Nominated by Count Iblis (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
- Oppose -- although it is interesting news, this does not rise to blurb-worthy significance, particularly since this has been occurring over a long period of time. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 05:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose as has been stated before, ITN is really not a good place for forecasts/predictions/scientific-based speculation on future impact of climate change. If there was some actual significant event that could be documented (we posted when the Larson ice shelf broke off in 2017 Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/July 2017) that would be news, but even if it is well-backed by science, hand-waving claims like this are not good ITN stories. --Masem (t) 05:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose good faith nomination, but this is not the right place for speculation. If it happens and if there's a big impact of it, then that would be ITN-worthy. But we don't post scientific predictions/speculation here. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per previous votes. Not seen in main RS news Thursday. – Sca (talk) 13:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose DYK. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 14:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
December 15
December 15, 2021
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
RD: Fayez Tarawneh
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.thenationalnews.com/mena/jordan/2021/12/15/former-jordanian-pm-fayez-tarawneh-dead-at-72/
Credits:
- Updated by KittenKlub (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Does RD have the stomach for another short (300 words) wikibio? Anyone familiar with Middle Eastern politics are encouraged to help beef up this wikibio for a former PM of Jordan. --PFHLai (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to go. Hanamanteo (talk) 08:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: bell hooks
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Lexington Herald-Leader, The Guardian, USA Today, NPR, NBC News, NYT, Wall St. Journal, BBC News, AlJazeera
Credits:
- Nominated by Tom Morris (talk · give credit)
- Created by AntonioMartin (talk · give credit)
- Updated by LorenzFuchs (talk · give credit), AleatoryPonderings (talk · give credit), Innisfree987 (talk · give credit) and SusanLesch (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Just died - prominent American academic and activist —Tom Morris (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Article has a few more citations needed. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support: came here to see if she was up on RD yet. Immediate international coverage (Guardian, BBC, ABC, won't list them all), hugely influential figure. Article is plenty good enough (despite the tags). — Bilorv (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support: Important and influential thinker. Article looks fine, some of the citations could do with formatting improvements. ClaudineChionh (talk – contribs) 22:59, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support- A major figure in Black feminism. -TenorTwelve (talk) 23:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support - Right up there with Angela Davis and Octavia Butler. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:25, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Even if all of the stars in the universe strongly supported, this won't be posted with two orange tags. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:44, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support as notability is unquestioned; issues with OR do need to be resolved, it appears those are being worked on. Once that situation is cleared this should be posted. Radagast (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support on quality, as major issues appear to have been addressed. Obviously a hugely important figure, but per the instructions above that's not the focus here. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 01:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment There a still a couple of cn tags to be dealt with. Pawnkingthree (talk) 02:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - There are few issues that needs to be addressed before posting. The article has, as far as can see, two cn tags and one bsn tag. People here seems to forget that RDs are posted based on article quality only.--Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 02:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. TJMSmith (talk) 02:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) New prime minister of Tonga
Blurb: Siaosi Sovaleni is elected Prime Minister of Tonga by the legislature. (Post)
News source(s): SCMP, Matangi Tonga
Credits:
- Nominated by Joofjoof (talk · give credit)
- Updated by IdiotSavant (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: The general election was last month. Joofjoof (talk) 11:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Both article are in good shape and well referenced. KittenKlub (talk) 11:58, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Seems sufficient. GreatCaesarsGhost 12:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support good to go. Although I wouldn't link the election article if it wasn't to mention in the blurb something along the lines of "after winning the election". _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 12:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support with just Siaosi Sovaleni article bolded. That article is just about long enough for front page (would be good to add any more information about him if more info exists). Bolding the 2021 Tongan general election implies that that election caused him to take office, which isn't the case, as he was elected by the Legislative Assembly of Tonga afterwards. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:27, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Aren't prime ministerial/premiership elections indirect elections? How was the new German chancellor phrased (w/o the Merkel part)? Howard the Duck (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Tonga has a formal process for electing its PM, with a parliamentary vote after each election or whenever the office is vacant. Its not a Westminster system, parties are weak (and not even legally recognised in the election process), and the structure of the Legislative Assembly (17 PRs, 9 nobles) makes the process highly uncertain.--IdiotSavant (talk) 23:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Aren't prime ministerial/premiership elections indirect elections? How was the new German chancellor phrased (w/o the Merkel part)? Howard the Duck (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to me. NW1223(Howl at me/My hunts) 16:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment this is technically ITN/R due to the wording of the instructions but not in keeping with the spirit of it. The 2021 Tongan general election was the thing to post, the legislature carrying out the formal act of "electing" Sovaleni was a foregone conclusion. We didn't post or even nominate that election, but this feels like a loophole. The election should stay in the blurb, should be bold, and should be held to a high quality standard as the election was the trigger for the change. --LaserLegs (talk) 19:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- LaserLegs In this case, it wasn't a foregone conclusion, because most of the deputies are independent. Even the two candidates for prime minister (Sovaleni and Eke) are not affiliated to any party.KittenKlub (talk) 19:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- This article covers the coalition building in detail. Joofjoof (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Most of those "independents" all rage quit the Democratic Party of the Friendly Islands it was essentially a third party calling itself "independent" of which Sovaleni is the leader. Come on. --LaserLegs (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- I think this article might show how uncertain it was (I was actually surprised that the nobles didn't do their usual and unite behind the minority candidate). As for most of the independents being former PTOA, that's due to the history of their extremely recent democracy, and its worth noting that most were elected against PTOA (and PTOA factional) candidates.--IdiotSavant (talk) 23:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Since we didn't post the election, and since there was no "major party" win, it seems unusual enough to stand on it's own as an ITN nom but it still feels like a loophole ITNR. --LaserLegs (talk) 19:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Most of those "independents" all rage quit the Democratic Party of the Friendly Islands it was essentially a third party calling itself "independent" of which Sovaleni is the leader. Come on. --LaserLegs (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- This article covers the coalition building in detail. Joofjoof (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Due respect, but I don't see this as a technicality at all. The language is "Changes in the holder of the office...except when that change was already posted as part of a general election." Even if we had posted the election, we could not have posted the change in the holder of the office. This specific issue was adjudicated previously. Because coalition governments are usually headed by the election winner, we don't need to post twice (see Ireland in 2020). But if a different person emerges, it's very much noteworthy. GreatCaesarsGhost 01:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- LaserLegs In this case, it wasn't a foregone conclusion, because most of the deputies are independent. Even the two candidates for prime minister (Sovaleni and Eke) are not affiliated to any party.KittenKlub (talk) 19:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
December 14
December 14, 2021
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
Law and crime
Science and technology
|
(Posted) RD: Jethro
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Metro
Credits:
- Nominated by Mjroots (talk · give credit)
- Created by Ghmyrtle (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Ghmyrtle (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Mjroots (talk) 09:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Article is in good shape. Thryduulf (talk) 13:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support I don’t see any major problems. Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Small article, but well-sourced. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to go. Hanamanteo (talk) 17:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Metro (RSP entry) is not a reliable source. Is the regional source in the article good enough? — Bilorv (talk) 22:25, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: I just threw in a few {cn} tags. More refs are needed, please. --PFHLai (talk) 22:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- All now sourced. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:50, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
RD: Ken Kragen
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Deadline Hollywood
Credits:
- Nominated by Masem (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Producer that organized "We Are the World" and "Hands Across America". Article needs some sourcing help Masem (t) 01:38, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- More refs, please. There are a few {cn} tags in the "Later life" section. --PFHLai (talk) 18:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Riccardo Ehrman
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Ansa
Credits:
- Nominated by Alsoriano97 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by KittenKlub (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: That Italian journalist who asked the best question at the best time in 1989. The article is a Start, but KittenKlub has done a good job of citing sources and expanding the content. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Notable journalist who (accidentally) helped kickstart the Revolutions of 1989 that began with East Germany. Fakescientist8000 (talk) 01:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to go. Hanamanteo (talk) 02:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posted --PFHLai (talk) 18:34, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) Cap-Haïtien fuel tanker explosion
Blurb: A fuel tanker explosion in Cap-Haïtien kills at least 60 people. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, AP, Reuters, AlJazeera, AFP (via France 24),dpa
Credits:
- Nominated by Dumelow (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: I know we don't like bus plunge-type stories but I think this is worth discussing. At least 50 dead. Haitian president Ariel Henry has declared three days of national mourning. Article is obviously not up to snuff yet - Dumelow (talk) 14:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Article is a 3-sentence stub. Needs a lot of expansion before it is appropriate for the main page. --Jayron32 14:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Widely covered. – Sca (talk) 14:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support A major disaster. The article will rapidly be expanded. Jim Michael (talk) 14:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wait until article is more developed. Will definitely support then. Kellis7 (Kellis7) 15:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
WaitI doubt there is any editor that would oppose on significance or support on quality. GreatCaesarsGhost 15:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)- Support While the article remains short, it tells a complete story with good referencing. We can wait for further development, but I see no obligation to do so. GreatCaesarsGhost 21:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Terrible tragedy. The article seems to be in decent shape. -TenorTwelve (talk) 20:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Article has expanded. Heythereimaguy (talk) 23:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to go. Hanamanteo (talk) 03:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 03:34, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment ITN actually loves bus plunge stories: Chiapas truck crash; 2021 Bulgaria bus crash; Sokoto bus massacre; Freetown fuel tanker explosion... See also: If it bleeds, it leads. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Literally the opposite of that. Gotta love how everyone who brings up "bus plunge" never takes the time to understand what it actually means. GreatCaesarsGhost 21:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment – AP on Wednesday puts toll at 75. Sca (talk) 17:24, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Abraham Lunggana
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [9] (in Indonesian)
Credits:
- Nominated by Juxlos (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: (Mostly) local politician in Jakarta Juxlos (talk) 05:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Article is sufficient. --Jayron32 14:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to go. Hanamanteo (talk) 18:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 19:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
December 13
December 13, 2021
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Sports
|
(Posted) RD: Blackberri
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Bay Area Reporter
Credits:
- Created and nominated by TJMSmith (talk · give credit)
- Updated by EmDiz (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American singer-songwriter and community activist. TJMSmith (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Long enough and with enough footnotes, this wikibio is READY for RD. I'm mildly concerned about the copyright status of the photo in the infobox, though. Really cc-by-4.0? --PFHLai (talk) 18:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- I uploaded a bunch more pix today, if anyone wants to swap out the one in the infobox feel free. Funcrunch (talk) 20:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Charles R. Morris
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYTimes
Credits:
- Nominated by Ktin (talk · give credit)
- Created by Heisler76 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Sunshineisles2 (talk · give credit) and Joofjoof (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American banker and economist. Article requires significant uplift before it can be ready for homepage / RD. I will get to it later tonight. If someone wants to get to it before me, please feel free to do so. Ktin (talk) 15:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to go. Hanamanteo (talk) 11:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. TJMSmith (talk) 12:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
RD: Jimmy Rave
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Daily Mirror, PWInsider
Credits:
- Nominated by Sceptre (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Former professional wrestler. Sceptre (talk) 21:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose there are lines and paragraphs without any source. Once they are fixed, the article will be ready to be included in the Main Page. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 19:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Quite a few citations are missing. Please add more footnotes and refs. --PFHLai (talk) 15:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Verónica Forqué
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): El Mundo, El País
Credits:
- Nominated by NoonIcarus (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Asqueladd (talk · give credit) and Innisfree987 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Spanish actress. NoonIcarus (talk) 20:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment A very sad death. I was also planning to nominate her.
Her wikibio is not bad but I think that, being an actress of the level she is, she could have a more in-depth coverage of her career and life, and the lists mentioned are incomplete. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC)- @Alsoriano97, agree about fleshing out—I’ve been adding some reviews but the archival sources I have access to are mostly in English so especially if you have more in Spanish, that would be very welcome! Innisfree987 (talk) 22:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Her article now looks good enough. Nice work! _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 23:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posted --PFHLai (talk) 00:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
(Closed) Miss Universe 2021
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Harnaaz Sandhu of India is crowned Miss Universe 2021. (Post)
Alternative blurb: In Miss Universe 2021, held in Eilat,Israel, Harnaaz Sandhu of India is crowned as the winner.
News source(s): CNN
Credits:
- Nominated by ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk · give credit)
- Created by Jjj1238 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Azmy25 (talk · give credit), Nofoolz (talk · give credit) and ApprenticeFan (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Tentative oppose, I'm not sure when was the last time we posted a beauty pageant winner. I will not go into the "Miss Universe? But all competitors were humans from Earth?" thing here :P The photo is likely a copyvio. --Tone 16:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- The pic has been tagged for speedy at WCommons. I'm removing it from ITN/C. --PFHLai (talk) 22:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Should go down a storm with WP:WikiProject Women in Red. Do we generally post Mr. Universe? How about Non-binary Universe Person? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- To take your question about the other Universe competitions at face value, I don't think we generally post any of them (or ITN/R would be involved...), but to ask that is to imply that all events run by the same company are equally newsworthy and otherwise notable. Kingsif (talk) 17:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Mr. Universe is actually run by NABBA. Not sure about the other one. Probably yet to be staged. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support - I am actually going to support this one this year. It is the 70th anniversary, article is fully sourced. Miss Universe is a major beauty pageant with at least a billion viewers all over the world. BabbaQ (talk) 16:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Even the organizers (who have incentive to inflate unverifiable viewership numbers) predicted the cast would "reach" (clever word choice there) 600 million. GreatCaesarsGhost 17:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, but it hasn't reached me yet. So please take at least one off your total. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Mom, he said you earn 1 billion dollars a year. You only earn 700 million a year.. oh poor me.BabbaQ (talk) 18:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah. My fave is the swimsuit competition.... like the lovely Miss Montana in 1973's Miss America: "subject prepared for a total brainwash"... Martinevans123 (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Mom, he said you earn 1 billion dollars a year. You only earn 700 million a year.. oh poor me.BabbaQ (talk) 18:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, but it hasn't reached me yet. So please take at least one off your total. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Even the organizers (who have incentive to inflate unverifiable viewership numbers) predicted the cast would "reach" (clever word choice there) 600 million. GreatCaesarsGhost 17:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Why aren't the spectators wearing bikinis? Should de rigueur. – Sca (talk) 15:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose posting subjective beauty pageants. 331dot (talk) 18:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Then I assume that the Academy Awards also are subjective. And should not be posted.BabbaQ (talk) 18:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- What makes the pageant organizers an authority on beauty, and what impact does the pageant have on society? Would you nominate my 331dot's Beauty Pageant? Movies and beauty are two completely different animals, as is The Academy and the organizers of this event. 331dot (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- oppose Not notable, nor is this more unique than Miss World or the other pagents. 99.247.176.90 (talk) 21:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose If ever a media event needs a pretty picture, it's this one, and I'd say the same for any new Mr. Universe if he ever came up. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support I don't like beauty pageants, but I understand that the Miss Universe contest is a pretty big deal around the world. Article is fine on quality. NorthernFalcon (talk) 01:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose not important enough for ITN. Also bolded article has copyvio photo and is barely long enough, focuses mainly on 2 competitions only, so article quality is not there either. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per 331, Joseph. Lacks general significance. – Sca (talk) 13:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Given the universal dislike of beauty pagaents nowadays due to its objectification of women, I don't think we should post these. --Masem (t) 13:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Objets de femmes? – Sca (talk) 14:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
(Closed) Conviction of Inger Støjberg
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: In Denmark, former Minister for Integration Inger Støjberg is impeached and sentenced to sixty days in prison. (Post)
News source(s): Euronews
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Unknown Temptation (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Tentative support, impeachment of a cabinet minister and prison sentence is a big story, though the impeachment article should be instead integrated into the main one, it is not long enough to merit being a stand-alone. --Tone 16:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- I can't imagine we would post a US cabinet secretary getting a hand slap like this. GreatCaesarsGhost 17:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Sentenced to prison? I think we would. --Tone 18:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Indeed; it would be a serious matter for a cabinet official in the US to see the inside of a cell. 331dot (talk) 20:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Sentenced to prison? I think we would. --Tone 18:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose many governments have members imprisoned, not seeing why this is ITN-worthy. And also, her article is woefully undersourced, and has a massive focus on controversies (in violation of WP:Controversy sections. The impeachment article is a stub. So no appropriate article has anything near an appropriate article quality. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Which other governments have cabinet officials/ministers in prison as a result of conduct related to their job? 331dot (talk) 20:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support on the merits, though news coverage seems limited. A cabinet official seeing the inside of a jail cell due to conduct related to their position is rare. 331dot (talk) 18:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support on the merits per 331dot, but I don't think coverage is "limited". I'm seeing it stateside in Bloomberg, plus there's European Politico, South China Morning Post, PerthNow, The Guardian, Spiege, and more. However, her article has an orange tag and the impeachment article is a stub. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Article has too many CN tags; the majority of the "Political Career" section is unreferenced, for example. Fix that before this can be posted. --Jayron32 19:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I would understand the supports if she were a former prime minister or former president, but not if she is a former minister. There are many countries, for example Spain, that have had ministers imprisoned for crimes committed during their tenure and I would not think of nominating them. We would be setting a reckless precedent. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Which Spanish ministers are in prison due to conduct related to their job? I would have supported that too. 331dot (talk) 21:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per both Alsoriano97 and Joseph2302. Also the sentence is very light. GreatCaesarsGhost 21:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- It is light compared to the general population, but rare for high government officials. If Donald Trump sees the inside of a cell for only 24 hours, it would be big news.331dot (talk) 21:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- If you need to compare the president of the United States to a low-ranking minister in Denmark, you are not making the point that you think you are. GreatCaesarsGhost 22:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- GreatCaesarsGhost I'm not comparing the former President to anything, just noting it is rare for high government officials to see prison. If it makes you feel better, use Wilbur Ross. 331dot (talk) 22:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- That's still the wrong form of government. This is like Birthe Rønn Hornbech getting pinched for the Palestinian sagsbehandling. Or Rikke Hvilshøj's car catching fire. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think you're comprehending how short a sentence this is. The punishment for simple assault is up to 6 months. I know someone who received several years for signing for his roommate's parcel delivery. I have no doubt Ross committed many crimes during his time in office. While I would be suprised if he faced prosecution for any of them, I would certainly see a two-month sentence as a miscarriage of justice. Aside, it is extremely bad form to criticise every !vote on a nom you disagree with. GreatCaesarsGhost 16:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- GreatCaesarsGhost I'm not comparing the former President to anything, just noting it is rare for high government officials to see prison. If it makes you feel better, use Wilbur Ross. 331dot (talk) 22:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- If you need to compare the president of the United States to a low-ranking minister in Denmark, you are not making the point that you think you are. GreatCaesarsGhost 22:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- It is light compared to the general population, but rare for high government officials. If Donald Trump sees the inside of a cell for only 24 hours, it would be big news.331dot (talk) 21:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose 'Former minister' faces a grand total of 60 days in prison. This is clearly not going through. Gotitbro (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Gotitbro, jailed for actions that she conducted in office. As though her resignation is why this isn't ITN? – Muboshgu (talk) 21:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- The blurb should be altered in that case. Still, can't see a case for a ministerial impeachment being notable enough for ITN in Denmark or otherwise [doesn't appear to be an above the fold news internationally as well, even Euro News somewhat buries it]. Heads of state/government would have been different (which is ITNR, I believe). Gotitbro (talk) 22:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Though, I would like to add, the reason for her impeachment is interesting and important enough (related to the current immigration crisis) and I would perhaps support if presented in the blurb as such. But the article is no shape to be on the main page: half uncited, half is of controversies with an unneeded fork on impeachment to boot. Gotitbro (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- The blurb should be altered in that case. Still, can't see a case for a ministerial impeachment being notable enough for ITN in Denmark or otherwise [doesn't appear to be an above the fold news internationally as well, even Euro News somewhat buries it]. Heads of state/government would have been different (which is ITNR, I believe). Gotitbro (talk) 22:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose My opinion is that if "government ministers who were imprisoned due to actions in office" are a thing then this ITN would be brimming with social ministers. Basically with the exception of one cabinet, every social minister in the last cabinet is now serving time in prison. Last time our social minister was technically "almost sentenced to death". So, yeah, this isn't a thing. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 02:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per Jeromi, Alsoriano. Lacks general significance; scant reader interest. – Sca (talk) 13:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I'm curious as to how you judged reader interest for the English speaking world, and where that is found in WP:ITN as a criteria. It does state "To point readers to subjects they might not have been looking for but nonetheless may interest them." 331dot (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I quickscanned my (secure) personal memory/factoid database, which comprises more than 500 million items. – Sca (talk) 15:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I'm curious as to how you judged reader interest for the English speaking world, and where that is found in WP:ITN as a criteria. It does state "To point readers to subjects they might not have been looking for but nonetheless may interest them." 331dot (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
New Prime Minister of Bulgaria
Blurb: Kiril Petkov (pictured) is elected Prime Minister of Bulgaria as part of a coalition government. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Kiril Petkov (pictured) is elected Prime Minister of Bulgaria as part of a coalition government, ending 8 months of political stalemate.
News source(s): RadioFreeEurope Bulgarian National Television
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by BastianMAT (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Change of the head of goverment of an EU country, WP:ITNR. Ends an 8 month political stalemate after 3 national elections. BastianMAT (talk) 14:25, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality surely there's more that can be said about him other than the last 3 months? Also, article is in violation of WP:Controversy sections- this should be covered in a general paragraph. Also, infobox implies he gave up Canadian citizenship, but this isn't in article anywhere? Also, the parties in the coalition aren't sourced in his article, we shouldn't be blurbing text not found in the bolded article. In principle, support as change of government is ITNR, but the article isn't quite good enough yet IMO. Also added an ALT2, as not sure listing all those party acronyms is helpful in ITN blurb. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per above; there's rather large gaps in his biography and I would expect more for a major world leader. Furthermore, WP:PROSELINE is a problem; the article would need to be re-written into a more natural narrative tone. --Jayron32 15:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment the proposed image has been nominated for deletion on Commons, though I believe the deletion rationale is incorrect. The copyright status of that photo should be checked by an admin before adding the image on front page here. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
SupportI don't see the article in bad condition. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per LaserLegs. I had completely forgotten about it. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose and not ITN/R. We posted the election, this is a formality. [11] --LaserLegs (talk) 19:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- This is ITNR. Since he is leading a coalition, there was no guarantee he was going to be the PM after the election results were announced. Changes in the principle executive are posted. LL has proposed changing this, which is within their rights to do, but as it is now, ITNR is correct here. 331dot (talk) 22:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- We posted his coalition won most votes. Back then, it was likely he would become the next PM. To merit another post, it would have to be someone else becoming the PM. My opinion. --Tone 14:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
December 12
December 12, 2021
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Sports |
(Posted) Grey Cup
Blurb: In the 108th Grey Cup, the Winnipeg Blue Bombers defeat the Hamilton Tiger-Cats in overtime, 33-25. (Post)
Alternative blurb: In Canadian football, the Winnipeg Blue Bombers defeat the Hamilton Tiger-Cats in overtime to win the Grey Cup
News source(s): CTV, TSN, CBC,
Credits:
- Nominated by NorthernFalcon (talk · give credit)
- Created by Cmm3 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by ViperSnake151 (talk · give credit)
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: ITN/R sports event happened. Article is good quality and is nearly ready for ITN. NorthernFalcon (talk) 05:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support the event is ITNR, and the article looks good enough. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support on quality I think the blurb should contain some geographic location. Many readers outside of North America may read this and have no idea, at first glance, what it is or where this cup is developed. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 11:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Added altblurb which mentions the sport (which we should always do), and therefore mentions country too. I don't think the exact score is relevant for the blurb either. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Altblurb looks much better. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 12:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support The Grey Cup article has been featured for the past few years and this game's article is similar in quality. Cmm3 (talk) 14:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posted altblurb. --Jayron32 15:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Post-posting comment Is "in overtime" really necessary? I think, as far as a main page blurb goes, that's cruft that doesn't add to the story. It'd be like mentioning that the F1 race was won on the last lap. I don't want to unilaterally change it, but I'm not a fan of that inclusion. -- Kicking222 (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I agree - if mentioning the score is not necessary, then neither is mentioning overtime.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 16:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The league is not prominent. Hcoder3104 (talk) 16:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Hcoder3104: The item is listed at WP:ITNR, which means that significance has already been determined. If you object to this inclusion, start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:In the news to have it removed from the list. --Jayron32 16:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Roland Hemond
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Athletic, MLB.com
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
– Muboshgu (talk) 23:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Sufficient coverage and sources.—Bagumba (talk) 06:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I've added a few {cn} tags for unreferenced materials. Please add more refs. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 10:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- PFHLai, all fixed up now. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the new footnotes, Muboshgu! --PFHLai (talk) 00:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- PFHLai, all fixed up now. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 19:13, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
(Closed) MLS Cup 2021
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: In Major League Soccer, New York City FC defeat Portland Timbers to win their first MLS Cup. (Post)
News source(s): [12] [13]
Credits:
- Nominated by JanderVK (talk · give credit)
- Oppose Don't we already have a multitude of soccer related entries on ITNR, clearly not as prominent as them. Gotitbro (talk) 23:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose not ITNR and not a prominent soccer league. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 23:32, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Gosh, I thought MLS stood for Multiple Listing Service. – Sca (talk) 00:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- That's because Americans decided to call it major, like how they call the winner of most of their sports a "world champion". Their choice of nonsense naming sytem doesn't make this an important league. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- To be fair even if the US had the best team in the world you would never let them play in your major leagues cause they're all in the British or B+1 time zone but if a handegg, Yank netball, Yankee cricket or ice hockey player is better than like one guy in one of our 4 major leagues they almost invariably become a player thus making the 4 leagues noticeably stronger than any other league of that sport in the world. So the winners are world champions even though London can never play (unless an eccentric billionaire manages to move one of the shit teams there, like the Pittsburgh Pirates) Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 01:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- What does CONCACAF stand for? Cón caffeíne but with a stutter? If New York City Football Club beats the 2022 CONCACAF Champions League (which has Liga MX® clubs) then a soccer team from the NY area would enter the Club World Cup for the first time! (like the world cup but not for countries) They play in Yankee Stadium! Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 00:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- The final was attended by just 25,000 spectators, this isn't a major league like the Premier League, Spanish La Liga or German Bundesliga. Any other football league with those comparatively low attendences wouldn't even be considered here. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yes we know soccer is not a big 4 sport here, you don't have to rub it in. Liga MX almost always wins the continent and is usually defeated by the CONMEBOL team if they meet who then usually lose to UEFA. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 01:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Yes we know soccer is not a big 4 sport here, you don't have to rub it in.
Wasn't trying to, but your other point that Liga MX is much better highlights my point: we wouldn't post that league, and so we shouldn't post the less important US league. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yes we know soccer is not a big 4 sport here, you don't have to rub it in. Liga MX almost always wins the continent and is usually defeated by the CONMEBOL team if they meet who then usually lose to UEFA. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 01:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Just FYI, the final's low attendance is due to the venue's constraints. The 2018 and 2019 finals both got upwards of 69,000 spectators (both sellouts of American football venues). SounderBruce 07:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- The final was attended by just 25,000 spectators, this isn't a major league like the Premier League, Spanish La Liga or German Bundesliga. Any other football league with those comparatively low attendences wouldn't even be considered here. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- That's because Americans decided to call it major, like how they call the winner of most of their sports a "world champion". Their choice of nonsense naming sytem doesn't make this an important league. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Gosh, I thought MLS stood for Multiple Listing Service. – Sca (talk) 00:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose not one of the world's major football (soccer) leagues, so not important enough for ITN. Posting this would be a WP:BIAS, as we wouldn't consider posting a comparably unimportant football league outside the US. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posting the results of a European competition would be enforcing systematic bias, while posting from a developing market within the sport would not, no? SounderBruce 07:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Not a bias, as those are the biggest leagues in the world, which is why they are posted (not because they're European, but because they're the biggest). The US league is maybe "upcoming", but it's nowhere near as important as those leagues. And other similar standard leagues in non-US countries wouldn't even be considered here. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posting the results of a European competition would be enforcing systematic bias, while posting from a developing market within the sport would not, no? SounderBruce 07:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. Leaving aside the world, I don't think this is a particularly important league in the US, at least not yet. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Biggest league in the US and scaling up. We've blurbed less - some I thought only existed as intramural sports. CoatCheck (talk) 21:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Article seems to be in good shape and I do not see an issue in adding another league to the list of leagues / tournaments that we report. Good luck. Ktin (talk) 21:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose we general post premier events in sport. The number of football competitions we post is already a little out of hand, but there's some ambiguity as to which competitions are top. There is no question this is far down the table. GreatCaesarsGhost 23:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Which table? Looks like another national-level football competition just blurbed in hours flat, minimal discussion and nearly identical attendance. CoatCheck (talk) 16:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- The Grey Cup is a different sport (Canadian football), and is ITNR, as it's the most important league in that sport. Whereas the MLS is association football/soccer, and isn't the most important competition in that sport. Trying to equate the two seems disingenuous to me. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Which table? Looks like another national-level football competition just blurbed in hours flat, minimal discussion and nearly identical attendance. CoatCheck (talk) 16:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. Past consensus on ITN is to treat MLS differently than the other major professional sports leagues in the United States and Canada. While MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL, and CFL could be considered the top league in the world in their respective sport, the same could not be said of MLS. MLS is just one of scores of similar leagues around the world. And MLS has a harder time attracting players around the globe, partially due to the fact that their spring-to-fall schedule results in scheduling conflicts with the FIFA calendar and with summertime international tournaments such as the FIFA World Cup. Just look at List of professional sports leagues by revenue, sort the Sport column, and see how many other association football leagues MLS has to compete with for a worldwide audience. Whereas the other five major professional sports leagues in the U.S. and Canada are at the top of revenues in their respective sport. Zzyzx11 (talk) 17:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
(Posted RD) RD/Blurb: Vicente Fernández
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb: Mexican singer-songwriter Vicente Fernández (pictured) dies at 81. (Post)
News source(s): NBC News CNN
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Alsoriano97 (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Unquestionable notability. I'm working on his article, but I'm already making the nomination in case it can serve as a call for other users to participate, there is a lot of work to do. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 15:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Support Blurb I added a potential blurb, as Fernandez was one of Mexico's (as well as the Latin-American world's) most notable and beloved musicians, sold over 50 million records, and even has a Hollywood Walk of Fame star. This is similar to how Diego Maradona was one of the world's most famous soccer players. The article is well sourced and is in great shape, though is still being cleaned up a bit to add a bit more unanimity for posting. DrewieStewie (talk) 13:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support, but oppose blurb. The referencing has much improved. There is one part left, however I don't think that it is really necessary to be included, so cutting that paragraph is fine as well IMO. Article is in good shape.KittenKlub (talk) 13:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support RD, at least, no opinion on blurb, big star. Alanscottwalker (talk) 14:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nom. comment I'm still working on the article. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 14:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support blurb Highly influential singer not only in Mexico but in Spanish-speaking countries and the US. He’s probably Elvis-level influential in Mexico. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 14:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support RD, no comment on blurb. Massively influential, but not sure if worthy of a blurb.The Kip (talk) 16:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support RD article is clearly good enough for RD. Neutral/no specific objections to blurb if there's consensus from others to do so (I don't feel qualified to judge the importance of him to Latin American music, which I have no knowledge on). Joseph2302 (talk) 17:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posting to RD. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, Should this be blurbed? There’s only one oppose vote that isn’t further elaborated on, and there’s concrete reasons given for support, with no further objections from those who are neutral to a blurb. DrewieStewie (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- I perceive "Support RD" to be opposing a blurb. More discussion can determine if there is a consensus for a blurb or not. I don't see enough support for it. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, Fair enough on the discussion portion, I agree. However, only one of them explicitly stated “oppose blurb”. The rest that didn’t explicitly support said an array of things such “no opinion, big star” “no comment, not sure, but indeed massively influential” and “neutral/no objections”. To me, rather than opposition, that sounds like a swing vote to me. If more supports come about, they become tantamount to supports. If more opposition comes about, they become tantamount to opposes. But I agree, more discussion is needed. DrewieStewie (talk) 20:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- I perceive "Support RD" to be opposing a blurb. More discussion can determine if there is a consensus for a blurb or not. I don't see enough support for it. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose blurb Not one of those rare occasions where a blurb for a recent death is justified. Pawnkingthree (talk) 20:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Blurb Known even outside the world of Mexican music. Wizardoftheyear (talk) 20:35, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Neutral blurb The arguments in favor of blurbing him seem valid, but I don't know enough about Mexican or Latin-American music in general to judge Fernandez's overall fame relative to the rest of the field, let alone all of popular music as a whole. Therefore it seems impossible for me to have any sort of informed opinion one way or another as to whether he is blurbworthy. --WaltCip-(talk) 21:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose blurb -- I checked the BBC, CNN, and Reuters; none have any news articles on their frontpages about it. It doesn't rise to the level worthy of a blurb -- RockstoneSend me a message! 21:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Old Man Dies Photo RD is fine. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose blurb The lack of votes here is telling. Most RD blurb noms get lots of attention- Colin Powell garnered dozens of !votes but was not blurbed. I would guess you're not seeing as many voices here because most editors have never heard of him. You could say that's a good reason to stay out, but I think it's a good reason to vote no. GreatCaesarsGhost 21:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) 2021 Formula One season, Max Verstappen
Blurb: In Formula One, Max Verstappen (pictured) wins the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, the final race of the 2021 Formula One World Championship and becomes the first ever Dutch World Champion. (Post)
Alternative blurb: In Formula One, Max Verstappen (pictured) wins the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, the final race of the 2021 Formula One season and becomes the first ever Dutch World Champion.
Alternative blurb II: In motorsport, Max Verstappen (pictured) wins the Formula One World Championship, while Mercedes wins the constructor's title.
Alternative blurb III: In motorsport, Max Verstappen (pictured) provisionally wins the Formula One World Championship, while Mercedes wins the constructor's title.
Alternative blurb IV: In motorsport, Max Verstappen (pictured) controversially wins the Formula One World Championship, while Mercedes wins the constructor's title.
News source(s): The Guardian, BBC Sport
Credits:
- Nominated by Mjroots (talk · give credit)
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Mjroots (talk) 14:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Support - all bolded articles are good quality. Just need a source added to the Verstappen article in the Racing record section. Anarchyte (talk) 14:44, 12 December 2021 (UTC)- Wait - Verstappen has been summoned to race control. Wait for that to resolve before moving forward. Anarchyte (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support once the article is updated and added ALT2. Unnamelessness (talk) 14:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. While formally correct, many people will associate "stock car" with a different type of car than a F1-car. Count Iblis (talk) 15:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I've reverted the IP's vandalism. We are here to report on what has happened, whether or not we agree with what has happened and our favoured driver has won or lost. IP has been given a 24-hr PBLOCK. Mjroots (talk) 15:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wait until section tag on Max Verstappen complaining of unsourced content on a BLP is resolved. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- It's not completely unsourced, so I've change the tag. Agree it needs addressing though. Mjroots (talk) 15:17, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose bolding of Max Verstappen, but support running the story with just the 2021 Formula One season article bolded. Unless there is some exceptional story relating to the individual, we typically do not bold them. See for example the Magnus Carlsen story currently on the main page, in which he is not bolded. — Amakuru (talk) 15:17, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Clarification: There is currently an orange tag on the relevant section of the 2021 Formula One World Championship, and no prose yet on the race today, so obviously that needs fixing too before going live. — Amakuru (talk) 15:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- First ever Dutch World Champion is exceptional, is it not? Mjroots (talk) 15:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- I don't really think so. When Portugal won their first Euro title in 2016, we didn't bold them. When Magnus Carlsen became the first Norwegian to win the chess title in 2013, we didn't bold him. I see no precedent that would support a bolding. — Amakuru (talk) 15:32, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Amakuru: as champion, Verstappen is the ITNR article. Mjroots (talk) 18:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Mjroots: Sorry, but no. WP:ITN/R says it's the "Formula One championship" that is ITN/R, not the champion. There is no other sport where we'd do this, with the only exception I can think of being Emma Raducanu in the US Open, but that was because her achievement was genuinely groundbreaking and unique. Being the first Dutchman to win doesn't count as groundbreaking. — Amakuru (talk) 19:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- A better way to put it: the championship article needs to be bolded, but if the actual winner article is in good shape or close to good shape, it would be smart to bold it as well; that's bonus points, but not required. The championship article does absolutely need to be at quality and ready as the bolded article, though --Masem (t) 19:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Mjroots: Sorry, but no. WP:ITN/R says it's the "Formula One championship" that is ITN/R, not the champion. There is no other sport where we'd do this, with the only exception I can think of being Emma Raducanu in the US Open, but that was because her achievement was genuinely groundbreaking and unique. Being the first Dutchman to win doesn't count as groundbreaking. — Amakuru (talk) 19:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Amakuru: as champion, Verstappen is the ITNR article. Mjroots (talk) 18:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- I don't really think so. When Portugal won their first Euro title in 2016, we didn't bold them. When Magnus Carlsen became the first Norwegian to win the chess title in 2013, we didn't bold him. I see no precedent that would support a bolding. — Amakuru (talk) 15:32, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- First ever Dutch World Champion is exceptional, is it not? Mjroots (talk) 15:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Clarification: There is currently an orange tag on the relevant section of the 2021 Formula One World Championship, and no prose yet on the race today, so obviously that needs fixing too before going live. — Amakuru (talk) 15:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wait. Ordinarily, I would support it going straight on the main page, but with the controversial circumstances surrounding the safety car restart, I'd prefer to wait until the result of the season is made official and it's clear Mercedes aren't going to descend on Lausanne with a battering ram and a team of expensive lawyers. Sceptre (talk) 15:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Is there any evidence such a thing is likely? Reliable sources are reporting that Verstappen won the title, so I don't think it's our place to be questioning that... — Amakuru (talk) 15:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- I was watching the race live; Toto Wolff was incredibly angry at the FIA before the chequered flag fell. Both Mercedes and Red Bull have been very litigious before the stewards all season, and Ted Kravitz was even saying on the World Feed that the restart was irregular. I'd wait until tomorrow to see what Mercedes does, because I can't not see this championship being decided in court. Sceptre (talk) 15:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- OR alert, but from the way that Michael Masi responded to Toto Wolff's concerns during the race, it's probably unlikely that any appeals by Mercedes would bear any fruit. Then again, as you say, it's not our place to speculate and the fact that the race ended controversially should not affect the fact that the F1 currently officially recognise Verstappen as the WDC. Anarchyte (talk) 15:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Mercedes have protested the result. Mjroots (talk) 15:43, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- The Mercedes protest includes a protest to the circumstances of the restart, which is the massive issue (with my racing fan hat on, I'm pretty sure the protest at Max overtaking under SC is a shot across the bow – Wolff saying "if you give Max a penalty, we won't take the restart to CAS"). The BBC Sport live feed has a lot of rumination over whether the safety car restart was regular or not, the answer of which will end up deciding the championship. Sceptre (talk) 15:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- No objection to the blurb but being described as champion on the Formula 1 website has no "official" standing. Officially the championship is only awarded at the FIA Prize Giving Ceremony[14]. 3142 (talk) 08:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support ALT3 now the stewards have made their decision at the circuit; given Mercedes have announced their attention to appeal to the ICA, Max is only provisionally the WDC until probably Thursday at the earliest. If the result gets overturned (either by ICA or CAS), then I think it would warrant another ITN entry. Sceptre (talk) 21:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Is there any evidence such a thing is likely? Reliable sources are reporting that Verstappen won the title, so I don't think it's our place to be questioning that... — Amakuru (talk) 15:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support article quality is fine. RS report the result, not Wikipedians' place to question it; if Mercedes want to file lawsuits they can, not relevant to the posting. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, the article quality is not fine. There is an orange tag in the "Closing rounds" section, and the same section does not yet include a write-up of the Grand Prix that took place today. — Amakuru (talk) 15:33, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wait. Appeal by Mercedes appears to be likely given that there are claims by prominent members of F1 community that FIA failed to adjudicate the race fairly. So, let's wait until RSs say that there won't be an appeal, and if there is one, let's amend the blurb to include the contested nature of the the victory. Melmann 15:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Wait We should know the result of this appeal fairly soon. Gopchunk (talk) 16:32, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support And know we know the result. Yes, there may yet be a further appeal but that's a longer process and at some point we have to report on things as they are now. Gopchunk (talk) 20:13, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support The appeal could take weeks, if not months. According to the BBC, "Mercedes took a barrister with them". Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Do we have a source for "weeks, if not months"? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- As I understand it now in real time, there's actual discussions between the race organizers, MErcades, and Red Bull right now as I type this, so we should reasonably expect a final-ish decision today. There could still be a more formal appeal that will take time, but this current actions should be resolved before posting. --Masem (t) 17:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's not as if it's like the US election! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ok. That's "no" then. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:25, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Mercedes have brought in a barrister to the stewards' room, which indicates they are lawyering up. Scuttlebutt in the paddock is also that they're preparing to go all the way to CAS. Sceptre (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wait - Sources need to be added to some parts of the article. I think we should at least wait until whatever is going on with the stewards is resolved before posting as well. I don't currently feel confident that we wont suddenly have to change what the main page says. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Mercedes' protest has been denied. MAINEiac4434 (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support - As other have already said, the appeal was rejected. According to the article, Mercedes can take this further in the coming days, but it can take long for a decision to come. For now, we should show the winner, also per article: "Mercedes took legal counsel into the appeal, but the stewards dismissed their claim - allowing Verstappen to celebrate his first world title." ZaniGiovanni (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support primary blurb as nom. At least as notable as the chess thing already mentioned. –DMartin 21:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support but Alt blurb 4. Was controversial, whatever the outcome (which now seems to hold). Martinevans123 (talk) 22:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 23:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Question Max Verstappen has an orange tagged section which needs more sources. Surely it shouldn't be allowed as a bold article in that state? Joseph2302 (talk) 00:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
(Posted) 2021 New Caledonian independence referendum
Blurb: In the final independence referendum, New Caledonia overwhelmingly rejects independence from France amid a boycott from independence parties. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters, France24, The Guardian, Aljazeera, AP, DW
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by BastianMAT (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Aréat (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: RS have declared that New Caledonia rejected independence, article is sourced although we're still waiting for the final vote count. Macron has celebrated the results as this was the final independence vote. Independence parties boycotted the vote as they did not agree with the date of the election. BastianMAT (talk) 14:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Haven't two referendums already taken place, were they posted/discussed on ITN? Gotitbro (talk) 18:25, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Both were. BilledMammal (talk) 20:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Don't see any reason for this to not go through as well then, Support. Gotitbro (talk) 23:16, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose it'd only be important enough to post if the vote was in favour of independence. Jim Michael (talk) 19:06, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support A US state, or a British country, or a EU country voting against independence would be sufficiently important to post, and so it is for New Caledonia. The result has also been widely covered in the news, particularly in French and Pacific news sources. BilledMammal (talk) 20:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I can't see the significance of this result if the independence parties boycotted. Pawnkingthree (talk) 21:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Significance is that it is the final referendum permitted under the accords; according to France and the loyalists, there will be no more, and according to those who support independence they will engage with the planned post-referendum process where the status of New Caledonia within France is decided. BilledMammal (talk) 22:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Exactly, this was the final one of the three, meaning New Caledonia is going to remain part of France for at least some time.BastianMAT (talk) 00:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Significance is that it is the final referendum permitted under the accords; according to France and the loyalists, there will be no more, and according to those who support independence they will engage with the planned post-referendum process where the status of New Caledonia within France is decided. BilledMammal (talk) 22:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support An independence referendum, recognized by the country holding it, in a G7 country? How often does that happen apart from there? Plus, it's the final one.--Aréat (talk) 22:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Isn't this WP:ITN/R? If so, notability is not an issue. —Brigade Piron (talk) 22:43, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- No clue if referendums/(independence referendums) are part of ITN/R. Although I do personally think that this is significant enough. If it is part of ITN/R, we can update that.BastianMAT (talk) 00:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- It's not. Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- If the presidential election of a micronation is ITN/R, then surely any election which could result in the creation of a such a nation should be ITN/R IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Brigade Piron: @BastianMAT: @Pawnkingthree: @King of Hearts: I opened a discussion on the inclusion of recognized independence referendum on here, if you wan't to participate.--Aréat (talk) 20:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- If the presidential election of a micronation is ITN/R, then surely any election which could result in the creation of a such a nation should be ITN/R IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- It's not. Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- No clue if referendums/(independence referendums) are part of ITN/R. Although I do personally think that this is significant enough. If it is part of ITN/R, we can update that.BastianMAT (talk) 00:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose not notable since it was overwhelmingly rejected, and local news relevant only to a subdivision of a country. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 00:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- According to the ABC, it is relevant to Australia (the previous title of that article stated "Here is why Australians should care"). I have yet to find sources stating so explicitly for other countries, but it would be reasonable to assume that it is relevant to all of France, as well as to the rest of the regional nations. BilledMammal (talk) 00:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support, we posted the previous two, and the results are relevant since they mean that New Caledonia will remain part of France, with geopolitical implications. Also, independence referenda are rare and we should not post only results that are pro-independence. A possible analogy, we would still have posted the result of the Brexit vote if people had decided to stay with the EU. --Tone 09:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support same importance as the previous two, arguably more as it's controversial, and might be the last referendum they have on it. Article is of sufficient quality, and is NPOV despite it being a very politically charged vote. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Article is good quality, story is a major news story. --Jayron32 15:36, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
OpposeThere are several tags in the article. Hanamanteo (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)- @Hanamanteo: No more tags, fixed it in a few minutes as the few sentences were easily verifable. BastianMAT (talk) 18:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to go. Hanamanteo (talk) 18:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Hanamanteo: No more tags, fixed it in a few minutes as the few sentences were easily verifable. BastianMAT (talk) 18:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Posted. SpencerT•C 19:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
References
Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents: