Jump to content

User talk:Magzblock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Magzblock, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 00:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Seattle Emerald (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 00:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Magzblock! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 00:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Seattle Emerald (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 06:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am TRYING to find decent places to cite, but people don't usually write about a small local newspaper. The vast majority of what I'm finding online are people excited about the South Seattle Emerald publishing their work, or publishing a story about them. I added what I could find. Magzblock (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Seattle Emerald (November 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 00:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Only one article has been written about the South Seattle Emerald, news papers don't write about each other a lot. I've linked everything that isn't an author bragging about their article in the South Seattle Emerald, or an org being excited to be written about in the Emerald. What can I do? Magzblock (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Seattle Emerald (November 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:South Seattle Emerald has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:South Seattle Emerald. Thanks! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Seattle Globalist (November 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Seattle Globalist (November 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, there are 5 in depth independent sources on my article. that should be enough. Magzblock (talk) 00:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5 in depth, secondary, independent sources

[edit]

The Seattle Globalist article has 5 independent in depth secondary sources. I would like to request that you please be thoughtful about how you enforce the notability clause, if it possible that what you want to count as notable is influenced by implicit bias? Wikipedia reports on this on its own pages, and notes that notability has been used to exclude pages on women, etc. Please see on the Wikipedia articles on racial and gender bias. Thank you! Magzblock (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Seattle Globalist (November 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Nagol0929 (talk) 15:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Magzblock. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Seattle Globalist, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Seattle Globalist has been accepted

[edit]
The Seattle Globalist, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ToadetteEdit! 13:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]