Talk:Bagan

Myanmar High‑importance

Bagan is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

Buddhism Mid‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Climate data correct?

The year-round average daily maximums are almost exactly constant, with a bit more variation in the lows. The climate data for e.g. Mandalay and Yangon both show more pronounced winter and summer climates. I wonder if the data (from holiday weather web site) is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.253.220.75 (talk) 05:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal

Hi, this is a minor content modification but having been this year in Bagan, I can relate the horse-carriage only rule is not at all respected. I have photos to prove it and even saw 3 buses for local tourists hidden behind one of the most famous temples for the sunset view (no photo of that), plus minibuses and 4WD for westerners. I suggest deleting : "Thus in order to preserve the original pagodas, only horse-driven carriage are allowed to travel among the pagodas.[1]" or adding to it "This rule is however largely ignored". I post this proposal beforehand because this is my first participation to wikipedia and do not want to do any wrong-doings. Antoinerev (talk) 10:11, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's true, tour buses definitely enter the temple areas, raising clouds of dust. On our way in to Dhammayangi we were also subjected to a convoy of at least a dozen black SUV's, each bearing a placard stating its function "PR vehicle", "Sweeper", etc.

Question on a different point: does anyone have any idea why the people of Bagan built so many of these temples? I've seen no information or even speculation on that. My personal guesses would be either 1) grave sites, 2) farmers' offerings for good harvests, or 3) status symbols. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.4.72.106 (talk) 08:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

The second paragraph of the article seems to be non-neutral against the actions of the military junta. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.221.232.197 (talk) 15:36, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the second paragraph only recounts the actions of the junta. it does not pass judgment on them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.218.12.140 (talk) 17:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraph simply states the fact, IMO. I was in Myanmar at the time of the repairs and it was controversial whether to repair ancient structures or not. It was suggested that the repairs should be done with advises from UNESCO experts but the government went ahead without significant archaeological protections to the repair works. It is no issue of dispute on this paragraph stating what actually happened. The editor also referenced to a valid, non political and neutral National Geographic article.[1] If there's no objections, I will remove the dispute tag. --Kyaw 2003 (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why bother with disputes between two users that don't even care to sign their posts? In my opinion, unsigned comments should be perfunctorily deleted. --AVM (talk) 23:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

National Geographic is not necessarily neutral (note: NatGeo uses Myanmar, but the author uses Burma). However, I feel the part about the golf course and watch tower are somewhat irrelevant, as pagodas were not destroyed for their construction. As Kyaw has said, the repairing of pagodas are a very controversial topic. Almost all pagodas, as places or worship, are repaired continuously, as visible with the Shwe Dagon Pagoda. The Shwe Dagon is also not in the UNESCO list, even though there have not been radical changes. This might suggest that UNESCO may be influenced by current issues. And, if we must drop our tradition of repairing pagodas (of course not radically) to be on a list, then, the Burmese should keep their identity than conforming to outside rules.

And the notion of repairing the pagodas to preserve their archeological style is a fairly recent importation into the Burmese mind. Their rampant repair is destroying the architectural heritage of Bagan, I do not argue. It is also occuring in other parts of Myanmar.

As for the unsigned comments, it shows there is lack of freedom of expression, as one side of the arguement is apparently more favoured by the "contributors" of wikipedia articles on Myanmar. Commentators who profess certain views are also attacked due to their views, which might prompt them to keeping themselves anonymous.

Bottom line: Repairing pagodas haphazardly, bad. But imposing western ideals on eastern culture is also wrong. Politics stinks everywhere.137.132.3.6 (talk) 03:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bagan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120110171948/http://www.holidaycheck.com:80/climate-wetter_Bagan-ebene_oid-id_5822.html to http://www.holidaycheck.com/climate-wetter_Bagan-ebene_oid-id_5822.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bagan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120803074057/http://culturemyanmar.org/pages/doa_royal_palace.html to http://culturemyanmar.org/pages/doa_royal_palace.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bagan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311215404/http://www.timemap.net/~hudson/pagan.htm to http://www.timemap.net/~hudson/pagan.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture section lacking neutral POV

Non-neutral embellishments in the Architecture section, in particular in the first two sentences, should probably be addressed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.228.138.209 (talk) 11:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]