Talk:Nanban (2012 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Tamil Nadu / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Removing the boxoffice vollection

The total box office collection of Nanban is stated as 265 croes .but the reference to that statement is not reliable.There's no doubt that nanban is a block buster.but boxoofice analysts from twitter (Sreedharpillai)state that nanban gross about 95 croes (5th highest grosing in tamil behind endhiren ,sivaji,thuppakki and 7aum arivu) )

https://twitter.com/sri50

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Nanban (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

plot too long

The Plot section ought to be whittled down to about a third of its length. I cannot do that, not having seen Nanban though I have enjoyed 3 Idiots four times. —Tamfang (talk) 23:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder whether it would read more easily if the flashbacks were told first, and then the frame story. —Tamfang (talk) 16:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

@Rajesh1977:, You need to discuss your concerns here per our policy WP:BRD, You cannot just change / remove a longstanding content since it is sourced using reliable references. The ones you added are not reliable per WP:RS, WP:ICTF, while Indian Express is. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

casting

For the lead role, [...] initial reports suggested that Suriya, Mahesh Babu and Ram Charan were the front runner, who however The actor cited not knowing that Shankar would direct the film he denied the film [....]

This looks like pieces of three sentences in a blender. Did all three named actors decline the role until they learned that Shankar would direct? —Tamfang (talk) 07:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]