Talk:Psycho (1998 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema / Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

nudity in the shower scene (another difference

now I don't want to sound like a pervert, but in the stabbing scene one can also see at least one of Heche's breasts (several times actually). Did't know if this was important enough to put in the main article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.157.115.11 (talk) 09:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Breasts? Pfft. According to Kevin Smith (on episode one of the podcast 'Hollywood Babble-On', about 54:45-56:15, http://www.smodcast.com/babbleon/index.html), you can see her anus, or 'brown eye' in that scene. But I think there are websites dedicated to that kind of 'special interest' trivia. Physischitzo (talk) 08:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

two more differences, psychological

I noticed two more differences in the movies, though both were somewhat subjective. In the original Loomis comes across as a level-headed guy with a streak of bad luck; in the remake he is more like a drifter who has to be directed by Marion and her sister. Some of Lila's and Loomis's lines are switched to dramatize the difference.

The second difference is that the psychologist seems to be thinking aloud in the remake, instead of a delivering a confident interpretation of events as in the original. Since the original's solution has been criticized as too pat, this might be considered the remake's one improvement. CharlesTheBold —Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlesTheBold (talk • contribs) 02:59, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

May, may, may...

Taken from "Differences between the 1998 and 1960 versions":

When Lila Crane discovers the body of Norman Bates' mother, several white doves suddenly fly up. As birds are a recurring motif in the movie, with Norman's hobby of stuffing dead birds, the sudden unexpected appearance of live birds here may symbolize the approaching end of Norman's presence in the motel.

Two problems: One, I have no clue which one the doves fly up from. Two. May. I say it may symbolize him going to have a cheeseburger. See the problem? -Babylon pride (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I'm tempted to remove it, but for now I marked it "citation needed".Professor slats (talk) 06:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the 1998 remake the birds are kept in a cage to die and then be stuffed. That's where Julianne Moore finds the mummy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.83.232 (talk) 06:17, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Differences

Thankfully someone else corrected differences section which incorrectly listed the cutaway shots during Arbogast's death. However, my original question remains: isn't the reclining naked woman shot from the Nine Inch Nails video for "Closer"? Or, at the very least, isn't it a deliberate reference to the video? I'm unable to find sources but was hoping someone who edits this page frequently could confirm/deny. Clockster (talk) 08:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Differences

Why and when was it removed? Sean 18:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean199813 (talk • contribs)

harrietmeaders@gmail.com

Cannot see Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates. Totally miscast. 2601:248:5480:D80:952B:18A:D7F:E0A4 (talk) 15:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]