User talk:BombCraft8

Welcome!

Hello, BombCraft8, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! jlwoodwa (talk) 04:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! BombCraft8 (talk) 04:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi BombCraft8! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. I appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism – if you'd like to get more involved, you may want to check out the some anti-vandalism tools or enroll in the Counter-Vandalism Unit's training academy.

Thanks for sweeping up after vandals!

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 04:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thx BombCraft8 (talk) 04:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lactic acid bacteria‎

For future reference, that spammer is covered here: User:Meters/Applied Food Biotechnology spammer Meters (talk) 05:27, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok BombCraft8 (talk) 18:02, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Serial commas

Hello, your edit regarding serial commas at About the sandbox was OK, but normally it's best to just leave them as they are; they're neither required nor prohibited here. Graham87 (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to User:Abdirahmanabdilahi/sandbox, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Fun fact: edit summaries are important, and they're not really for joking around, despite what you said here. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 21:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But how is nominating a page for G11 a test edit? BombCraft8 (talk) 21:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your weird edit summary was. Drmies (talk) 22:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ahh BombCraft8 (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Homo hop. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. As mentioned before, please do not joke around in edit summaries. LR.127 (talk) 06:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok BombCraft8 (talk) 19:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:23.241.114.84

Hello, BombCraft8,

Why did you get into a dumb edit war with a troll? You could have received a block for all of these talk page reverts. Additionally, editors are free to remove messages from their talk pages, even vandals and trolls, so you were incorret to insist on replacing a warning again and again. If you do this in the future, you can expect to receive a block for edit warring. Please don't make this mistake again. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:21, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page itself was vandalism, it's better to tag if for speedy deletion than get in an edit war. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will remember that for the next time IPs abuse their talk page access BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 20:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting sockpuppets

To report accounts for suspected sockpuppetry, you should go to WP:SPI. Alternatively, it's easier to use Twinkle to make a report. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know, the main reason why I just put a notice on the talk page was cuz I didn't know the sockmaster's username BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 03:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Hello, BombCraft8,

Please do not even think of moving a category. That is a task for page movers, bots and administrators. For example, in you wanted to move Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for promotional user names to a category with a different name, you'd have to manually move all of the category contents (which is 325,870 pages) to the new category. Pages aren't automatically recategorized when you move a category to a different page title, you, or a bot, has to manually recategorize each one of those pages. Are you ready to spend the next few years taking care of that chore? Of course not, that's why we have bots to handle this task.

If you really believe a page move is important, it's best to make a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves and your request can be considered. For category renames, post a request under "Speedy renames" at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Speedy renaming and merging, using the appropriate criteria in your request. If you have other questions about page moves or categorization, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 01:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message to BombCraft8

Unfortunately, despite you've said in your edit summary the serial comma is not clearly superior as a matter of course. It is perfectly optional in many cases, and unilaterally enforcing its use across a large number of articles articles is considered disruptive. Remsense ‥ 论 13:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But what about removing the dash in "coordinates"? MOS:COORD spells coordinates with no - BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 13:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, give me a reason why these articles are better without oxford commas BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 13:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have to. They're not better with them, and MOS:SERIAL specifically allows both. As I said, the main point is enforcing one's personal preferences not backed up by site policy or community consensus is disruptive. It would be just as easy for someone to go across 100 articles you care about and only remove the serial commas—wouldn't that annoy you deeply? So we opt for consistency within articles within reason and that's all.

Since you're still unsure generally, Serial comma actually has a nice section detailing various positions for, against, and agnostic. To clarify, though it's unimportant I generally prefer using it myself where it doesn't make the prose more ambiguous (which it can do!)—I used to have a very strong preference for it before I started editing and realized it's not material most of the time and there are other details more worth arguing about. Remsense ‥ 论 15:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 15:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LTA

Consensus is not to feed this particular troll in any manner. They're tolerably easy to spot, we don't need a shrine for them. Revert, block, ignore. Acroterion (talk) 15:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. You're talking about MidAtlanticBaby or AveragePigs? BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 16:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nvm BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 16:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fire in the hole

Enough of the meme crap and misuse of edit summaries; edit summaries are for describing your edit, not your personal musings. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 11:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't consider that "misuse of edit summaries" since I had a legit reason for mentioning the meme. My guess is that you did not read the full edit summary. BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 11:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You also added nonsense/gibberish edit summaries to the Hurricane Milton article. I strongly encourage you to stop; before you get blocked. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 21:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ill try to stop BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 22:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page 1st meridian east, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. And on all of the other articles. "Co-ordinate" is not a typo, it's British spelling. Stop changing the spelling. Meters (talk) 21:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've almost never heard it spelled with the hyphen, but now I know lol BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 23:52, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit filter log

Hi, BombCraft8, thanks for alerting me to the edit filter issue. The remaining problem has now been oversighted. Bishonen | tålk 17:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 18:17, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really, it should be more commonplace for admins to check and delete the filter log too when they use revdel/oversight, as this is far from the first time that I've been able to view a revision deleted/oversighted revision by checking the filter log BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 18:21, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]