User talk:Jassu712

July 2023

Hello, I'm Nythar. An edit that you recently made to List of Sikhs seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Nythar (💬-🍀) 05:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dharmendra, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Samrat and Qayamat. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"List of 2025 Indian Premier League personnel changes" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect List of 2025 Indian Premier League personnel changes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18 § List of 2025 Indian Premier League personnel changes until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 23:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:This is a list of all personnel changes for 2024 Indian Premier League.

Hello, Jassu712. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:This is a list of all personnel changes for 2024 Indian Premier League., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False edit summaries

Please leave accurate edit summaries, your claim that you were "fixing typos" in the following edit is blatantly false: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1245666200&oldid=1245665885&title=Baghel_Singh MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 02:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jai Singh Kanhaiya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nurpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Promethean (talk) 11:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was a fairly large removal of cited content, and is very easily mistaken for vandalism. Please use more detailed summaries other than 'edit' Promethean (talk) 11:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Promethean okay sorry sir actually that content was already mentioned in detail in another section Jassu712 (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jassu712! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Sukerchakia Misl several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Sukerchakia Misl, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. APK hi :-) (talk) 08:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@APK okay thank you sir I will do dispute resolution options Jassu712 (talk) 09:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@APK like you said I didn't edit Sukerchakia Misl again but our Panjab keep doing whatever he wants instead of waiting for third opinion Jassu712 (talk) 09:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sukerchakia Misl shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You two are continuing to edit war despite my earlier advice. APK hi :-) (talk) 10:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i already take your advice sir earlier but it's our Panjab who keeps doing whenever he wants i will not edit Sukerchakia misl page till i get third opinion from now Jassu712 (talk) 10:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Achal

Hi there, I have removed your recent additions to Battle of Achal for now, because they contained badly botched formatting. Different citations used the same ref name, and there were other errors as well. Please get in the habit of using Preveiw when editing. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 03:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jessicapierce okay sir Jassu712 (talk) 05:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please look over your more recent edits. You have created another formatting issue (you can see the big red error under the References section). In addition, the new beginning paragraph is not a complete sentence and makes no sense. You also ended several sentences with commas. Please address these issues. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 22:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

about Conflict of interest

Hello, I'm Our Panjāb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Warriach have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Oh hey there, your latest edit on the article warraich passing severe misalignment and clearly reflecting the possible attempt to seize the article autonomy, nevertheless all of the source internally showcasing in the article is to the point without any kind of turbulence make sure you be careful without any acquisition