User talk:Kailash29792

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60

This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Varisu

@Kailash29792: I think so we don’t need to expand the article too much. But I don’t why do we need to expand this article too much. Some IP editor is adding so much of extra information but only the necessary information needs to be added right?

No such rule. If you feel the article is becoming too big, separate articles can be created.

Tamil review by Kalki

There's an incomplete review in Thacholi Ambu. I cannot read Tamil. Can you help. 117.230.91.174 (talk) 15:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are also good color posters in IMDb.--117.230.91.174 (talk) 15:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Srivin, help with the review please? I ain't got time. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naanum Rowdy Dhaan

Hi @Kailash29792, I wanted to bring up the issue of Naanum Rowdy Dhaan with you. I didn't appreciate your wholesale revert of my edits, and I don't think it was appropriate for you to mention in the edit summary the temporary block that had been placed on me. Wholesale reverts are discouraged, unless all the changes made are seen to be unconstructive, and I had been blocked temporarily for reasons I've disputed. Maybe one day, you'll be at the receiving end of an action you feel is excessive or unfair, and then perhaps you'll understand how I felt. Regardless, you shouldn't treat my work as if I were some fly-by-night, disruptive editor, as that is certainly not what I am. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 18:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was removing sources not considered reliable by WP:ICTF. Perhaps I should've put {{inuse}} to make things clear. Kailash29792 (talk) 00:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't addressed the main point I was trying to get across to you, which is that reverting (especially wholesale) with the reason that "editor is blocked" is neither appropriate nor collegial. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry about that. More than the wholesale revert being wrong, I should've explained in the edit summary that I was fixing good refs and removing bad ones. I misunderstood that you were indeffed. My bad. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Can you somehow do a deep search and find reliable sources for Upendra_(film)#Themes_and_influences? DareshMohan (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All is best removed. If someone knows Kannada, they can expand on the existing sources in that section. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vettaikaaran 100 crore world wide box office collection in its full run add it bro

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movies/news/varisu-to-villu-title-of-vijays-films-that-started-with-v/photostory/92382103.cms 103.76.183.72 (talk) 09:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What a sick joke. I honestly don't care how much it really earned, I want the article to be true to what is known. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Petta film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Petta film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]