User talk:SolarFlash

Hello & welcome to SolarFlash's personal talk page. Discussion related to editing only please. If I've made a mistake (oh yes, it happens) consider letting me know before you revert; I'll be more than happy to go back and fix any mistakes I've made.

Be advised, however, that personal attacks, rants, and other unconstructive comments just might be deleted or archived immediately and probably won't receive a response.

If you're here because I've reverted you and now you're mad, take a deep breath and don't freak out: my edit summary most likely explained precisely why it happened; please read that before you show up here in search of vengeance.

If you're here because you believe I'm trying to kill you (I've been accused of this by an editor, I kid you not), see your doctor immediately. Best regards to all.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|SolarFlash}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Second Opinion

Curious, Talk:Whip_It_(Devo_song)#KROQ_Top_106.7_Countdowns, based on your past experience, what is the next best step? And sorry if I name dropped you. --evrik ^(talk) 03:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Randy Rhoads

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Randy Rhoads you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MisterCake -- MisterCake (talk) 22:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Randy Rhoads

The article Randy Rhoads you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Randy Rhoads for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MisterCake -- MisterCake (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Randy Rhoads

The article Randy Rhoads you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Randy Rhoads for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MisterCake -- MisterCake (talk) 04:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]