Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARCTUROS (organization)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Withdrawn. Article was significantly improved since the start of this AfD. Moving to Arcturos (organization) as suggested below. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ARCTUROS (organization)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost all sources provided are primary, and coverage from secondary reliable sources is clearly lacking (in order to pass WP:NORGANISATION). Article also seems a bit promotional, but not enough to be eligible under G11, in my opinion; and is the reason why I brought it here to AfD instead of tagging it under the CSD criterion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Greece. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organizations, and Environment. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:52, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added many secondary sources that verify pretty much every single piece of information in the arcticle. If I am understanding the process well enough, this should save it from deletion. Am I right? Pedeiaenthusiast (talk) 20:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've been at work to improve this article significantly. Significant rewriting, addition of information regarding the organization's activities, and especially using news articles, research journal articles, etc., in place of citing organization's own website and materials. @Pedeiaenthusiast, the issue is described in WP:NORGANISATION, where the concern is that too many of the citations refer to arcturos.gr, when there is plenty of information (e.g. eKathimerini) that can validate these claims. I've also deleted passages that felt promotional and unnecessary for an encyclopedia (Vodafone) or that I could not verify elsewhere (number of students passing through the org).

I believe this should save this from deletion now, @CycloneYoris? What does that process involve? Psychopomplemousse (talk) 05:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Psychopomplemousse: Yes, you did a fantastic job with improving the article. I'll go ahead and withdraw this nomination (since the reasons for deletion are no longer relevant). CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 21:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, article has been improved since nom and now passes WP:NORG. मल्ल (talk) 19:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY. I can't read the Greek sources but the English-language sources appear sufficient for an WP:NORG pass. (Upon closing of this discussion someone needs to move the article to Arcturos (organization) per WP:MOSCAPS since the name appears not be an acronym.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.