Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elon University School of Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep; nomination withdrawn and there are no outstanding delete !votes. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:17, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elon University School of Law

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I like to have the opinion of the community if this article is an advertisement or not. It is too beautiful, almost bragging. I don't have a good feeling about this just 5 years old institute. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 19:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep because the nominator seems to be asking for editorial advice rather than deletion. Failing that, keep since there is plenty of significant coverage shown and any issues with tone can be dealt with in the normal way. ╟─Treasury Tag►Alþingi─╢ 20:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Universities are considered notable by long standing consensus, and law schools are usually notable enough and distinctive enough for their own articles. I see nothing about this school or this article that would justify deletion. Cullen328 (talk) 20:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This kind of tone is unfortunately common in articles about colleges, but I think it's better to put in the effort to clean it up rather than deleting. Qrsdogg (talk) 20:52, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the basis of our commonly accepted practice of granting per se notability to degree-granting institutions. If there is promotional fluff in the prose, this is not the place to fix it. Carrite (talk) 20:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Please close this AfD and keep the article. I am convinced. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 21:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.