Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Godon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources brought forward here seem to indicate notability, as does the WP:NACTOR claims. These sources should probably be used in the article, though. This was already relisted twice and the second one brought no further commentary, so another relist is probably pointless. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Godon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed with the apparent basis of not using PROD but he's still not notable considering there's simply nothing major listed go suggest convincing substance. SwisterTwister talk 17:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What did your WP:BEFORE searches find? --Michig (talk) 18:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we cannot have an article sourced only to IMDb.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per lack of WP:BEFORE. I have not made indepht searches in Belgian/French sources, I only looked at the French version of the article /[1]) and it includes a half dozen articles about Godon, all of them apparent examples of significant coverage from independent reliable sources including major publications such as La Dernière Heure and Le Soir ([2], [3], [4], [5], [6]). Also, many if roles, even if rarely leading roles, are actually prominent and significant, eg. A Secret, Le Lièvre de Vatanen, Nothing to Declare, Erased, La chance de ma vie, Fishing Without Nets, The Long Falling, so I don't see how he fails WP:NACTOR requirements. Cavarrone 19:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Coverage identified above indicates notability. --Michig (talk) 06:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.