Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'll Bury You Tomorrow
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Once nominator was informed of improvements, he withdrew the nom and there are no delete votes, and since the withdrawal there had been no further comments. Schmidt, Michael Q. 14:36, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll Bury You Tomorrow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable, low budget film with no credible sources. The actors and actresses do not even have pages on here. Tinton5 (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It took some digging, but I found several movie reviews for the film. I also found some mention of the film in relation to a necrophilia case, but I don't know how well that would count towards notability. I added those mostly as an extra to the article. In any case, the sources should allow it to pass notability guidelines now. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 23:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per meeting WP:NF, and with major appreciations to Tokyogirl79 for her editorial efforts. While certainly the nominated version had issues, Tokyogirl79's work improved the article considerably. Well done. Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes I agree with the above. Thank you for improving the page, as I will now withdraw this nomination. Tinton5 (talk) 23:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.