Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Marquis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 04:38, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Joshua Marquis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Declined G11, but nonetheless appears to fail WP:BIO. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral - with the addition of some sources, subject could well be found to be notable. For example, does he hold a position with the National DA Assoc? Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. He seems notable enough based on google news. The info about the book seems wrong. Perhaps a different book or he wrote only a chapter? VG ☎ 04:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep per this search. With sourcing this may be suitable, as it seems notability may exist. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 05:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.