Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mail & Guardian 200 Young South Africans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No agreement and minimal participation after two relists. RL0919 (talk) 02:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mail & Guardian 200 Young South Africans

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesnt merit its own article. Not independently notable. Rathfelder (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: seems like a positive award with some RS coverage. I am undecided. Wm335td (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MarginalCost (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Last relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoolSkittle (talk) 02:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Soft Keep Looks like enough coverage to establish notability but I am not enough of an expert on South African media to give it much more than that. hewhoam areismyself 06:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.