Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PlayAlong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PlayAlong

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Old product that never went anywhere, should be redirected to the main company article. There's some coverage (e.g. this Adweek piece), but everything substantive I've been able to find looks like a press release, with the exception of this one article from the Hollywood Reporter, which isn't enough on its own for WP:NCORP. Rusalkii (talk) 06:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (talk) 06:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Games, Internet, and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unreferenced ad. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Cannot find sufficient significant coverage and certainly reads like an ad. popodameron ⁠talk 13:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There's a musical website that uses the name now. Nothing for this "product" found. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.