Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R.O.O.T.S
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 03:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- R.O.O.T.S (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:CRYSTAL No reliable sources quoted in article, none apparently available. No announcement from label or artist. —Kww(talk) 11:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.
SIS11:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] - 'Delete per nom. --Winger84 (talk) 16:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dont' delete. Wait for more information, just like my article, and it should come. And besides, one of tracks are already out. Go to YouTube and search Guarantee. You'll see it. DJ BlackZilla (talk) 21:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom: speculation. Cliff smith talk 06:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete. The sources are from TV and radio interviews therefore can not be referenced on the internet, and as it was in a smaller country discussion as not yet reached the Internet, but the information should come soon therefore this article should left and not deleted, this way the article can be expanded on as information comes to hand. The announcement was also made by the artist himself.User:Wilsontoddlive
- Delete, WP:CRYSTAL, same reasons: no announcement by artist or label. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 20:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete. With the release drawing near an announcement is near, would you like to come to my house to watch the interview i have recorded? User:Wilsontoddlive —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilsontoddlive (talk • contribs) 21:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete. I have found the audio of the interview on the radio stations website where the artist announces the album. Added the reference to the page. User:Wilsontoddlive —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Comment I listened to the interview, and it doesn't confirm a release date or tracklist.—Kww(talk) 22:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yeah, that still fails WP:CRYSTAL. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:35, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment But it does confirm album name, so in that sense article should remain, I can not find the MTV interview online where artist speaks of possible collaborations. So unreferenced information should be removed. --Wilsontoddlive (talk) 22:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete. I have found a video of another radio station interview in NZ where he mentions the name of the new album and the producer. http://www.zmonline.co.nz/Video/AccessAllAreas/Detail.aspx?id=10003 --Wilsontoddlive (talk) 23:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Have found another interview with the same radio station where he touches on collaborations, still nothing solid but then still no reason to delete this article. It is mentioned around 3.40ish http://www.zmonline.co.nz/WhosOn/NightCrew/Highlights/Detail.aspx?id=9733 --Wilsontoddlive (talk) 23:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future album, early information about it should be in the artist's article only, not in a separate article about the unreleased album. Also, the title, track listing and release date need to be publicly confirmed by the artist or record label. Cliff smith talk 04:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment OK so delete?--Wilsontoddlive (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In short, yes. At length, the article can be re-created once at least the title, track listing and release date have been verified by reliable sources. Cliff smith talk 16:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment OK so delete?--Wilsontoddlive (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.