Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SafetyNet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SafetyNet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software fails WP:NSOFT/WP:GNG. More importantly, however, I maintain this is a pretty clear example of a G11 despite it being declined. The article comprises a brief definition, an official website link, operating system compatibility, and a big list of features copy/pasted from the dev website. That's all. If what's on Wikipedia would be just as at home on a spec sheet or marketing brochure on the company website, it should really be G11. (It was not, btw, CSDed for WP:COPYVIO reasons as I had not yet noticed the extent to which the features list was copied). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:23, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It also appears that this article was created/written by the software developer (at his/her userpage: "My Professional presence on the web is: http://devmentor.org"). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Searches are turning up no evidence that this framework has attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search did not turn up any WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.